We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reassessing Whether Biodegradable Microplastics Are Environmentally Friendly: Differences in Earthworm Physiological Responses and Soil Carbon Function Impacts
Summary
Researchers compared the toxic effects of conventional (PP, PS) and biodegradable (PLA, PHA) microplastics on earthworm physiology and soil carbon function in haplic phaeozem soil. Biodegradable MPs were not environmentally friendly — PLA and PHA caused comparable or greater physiological stress in earthworms and disrupted soil carbon cycling to a similar degree as conventional plastics.
Biodegradable plastics are not a primary solution to plastic pollution, and empirical evidence on whether they are environmentally friendly remains lacking. In this study, we systematically compared the toxic effects of traditional microplastics (polypropylene, PP; polystyrene, PS) with biodegradable microplastics (polylactic acid, PLA; polyhydroxyalkanoates, PHA) on the haplic phaeozem ecosystem. Through mathematical modeling analysis, it was found that earthworms initially rely on antioxidant enzymes to resist stress, mid-term activation of detoxifying enzymes to repair damage, and maintaining physiological balance through metabolic regulation and immune enhancement in later stages. We elucidated their mechanism differences: PLA and PP caused severe damage to the antioxidant system and cell membrane, with PLA mainly relying on POD to clear peroxides and PP relying on GST. In addition, PLA and PS can induce early neurotoxicity (AChE), while PHA induces late neurotoxicity. Furthermore, this study provides direct evidence proving that biodegradable microplastics are not environmentally friendly by breaking through the one-way research framework of "microplastic biotoxicity" and innovatively constructing a path analysis model that links biological physiological responses with soil ecological functions. We also provide a scientific basis to evaluate the ecological risks of microplastic pollution in soil and the whether biodegradable plastics are truly environmentally friendly.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Toxicity comparison of multiple biodegradable and conventional microplastics on earthworms: Ingestion, tissue damage, oxidative stress, and transcriptional responses
This study compared the toxicity of four biodegradable microplastics and conventional polyethylene microplastics on earthworms across multiple biological endpoints. Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics caused tissue damage, oxidative stress, and altered gene expression at levels comparable to or sometimes exceeding conventional plastics, challenging the assumption that biodegradable alternatives are inherently safer for soil organisms.
Short- and medium-term effects of biodegradable microplastics (PLA and PHB) on earthworm development and reproduction
Researchers tested whether biodegradable plastics (PLA and PHB) are truly safer for soil organisms than conventional polyethylene by exposing earthworms to all three types of microplastics. While none caused immediate harm or death, both PLA and conventional polyethylene reduced earthworm reproduction over medium-term exposure, producing fewer cocoons and offspring. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally harmless and suggests they may pose similar risks to soil ecosystems as conventional plastics.
Effects of conventional versus biodegradable microplastic exposure on oxidative stress and gut microorganisms in earthworms: A comparison with two different soils
Researchers compared the toxic effects of conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on earthworms in two different soil types. Both types of microplastic caused oxidative stress and altered gut microbiota in earthworms, with toxicity increasing at higher concentrations. The study found that microplastic concentration was more important than the type of plastic or soil in determining the level of harm, and that biodegradable plastics were not necessarily safer for soil organisms.
Ecotoxicological effects of soil microplastic types and concentrations on earthworms
Researchers tested the effects of conventional polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics alongside biodegradable PBAT microplastics on earthworms over 28 days. They found that PP microplastics caused significant mortality at the highest concentration, while PBAT, despite being marketed as biodegradable, induced the highest levels of DNA damage and cellular stress. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily less harmful to soil organisms than conventional plastics.
Different mulch films, consistent results: soil fauna responses to microplastic
Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PLA/PBAT microplastics affect earthworms and springtails in soil over 28 days. Neither plastic type significantly harmed reproduction, but subtle cellular stress responses were detected, and the effects were similar for both conventional and biodegradable plastics, suggesting that biodegradable alternatives may not be safer for soil organisms.