We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ecotoxicological effects of soil microplastic types and concentrations on earthworms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested the effects of conventional polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics alongside biodegradable PBAT microplastics on earthworms over 28 days. They found that PP microplastics caused significant mortality at the highest concentration, while PBAT, despite being marketed as biodegradable, induced the highest levels of DNA damage and cellular stress. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily less harmful to soil organisms than conventional plastics.
Microplastics (MPs) pollution in terrestrial ecosystems has raised global concerns due to its potential threats to soil health and biota. This study systematically investigated the ecotoxicological effects of conventional plastic materials (i.e., polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP)) and biodegradable (poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)) MPs on the earthworm Eisenia fetida under environmentally relevant concentrations. A 28-day soil incubation experiment was conducted with MPs exposure at 0.05 %, 0.5 %, and 2 % (w/w). Endpoints included survival, growth, reproduction, oxidative stress biomarkers, histopathological alterations (via H&E staining), and the integrated biomarker response (IBR). Results revealed polymer- and concentration-dependent toxicity. While PE- and PBAT-MPs did not significantly affect survival and growth, PP-MPs exhibited a paradoxical dose effect: 2 % PP-MPs caused significant mortality (16.7 %, p < 0.05), whereas 0.05 % PP-MPs stimulated growth (42.1 % increase, p < 0.001). All MPs treatments disrupted reproductive efficiency, increasing cocoon production without corresponding juvenile output. Oxidative stress and tissue damage (epidermis, intestine, and reproductive organs) were observed at 0.5 % and 2 % exposures. Notably, PBAT-MPs induced the highest cellular toxicity, evidenced by elevated 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OhdG, 190.9 ng L) and IBR values, indicating heightened DNA damage and integrative stress. These findings underscore the ecological risks of both conventional and biodegradable MPs to soil invertebrates, emphasizing the need for comprehensive risk assessments that consider polymer-specific toxicity and long-term exposure scenarios.
More Papers Like This
Toxicity comparison of multiple biodegradable and conventional microplastics on earthworms: Ingestion, tissue damage, oxidative stress, and transcriptional responses
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared the toxicity of four biodegradable microplastics and conventional polyethylene microplastics on earthworms across multiple biological endpoints. Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics caused tissue damage, oxidative stress, and altered gene expression at levels comparable to or sometimes exceeding conventional plastics, challenging the assumption that biodegradable alternatives are inherently safer for soil organisms.
Effects of conventional versus biodegradable microplastic exposure on oxidative stress and gut microorganisms in earthworms: A comparison with two different soils
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the toxic effects of conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on earthworms in two different soil types. Both types of microplastic caused oxidative stress and altered gut microbiota in earthworms, with toxicity increasing at higher concentrations. The study found that microplastic concentration was more important than the type of plastic or soil in determining the level of harm, and that biodegradable plastics were not necessarily safer for soil organisms.
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics (PBAT-BD-MPs) on earthworms (Eisenia andrei) across a range of concentrations in an eight-week reproduction test. Both polymer types were assessed for impacts on survival, reproduction, growth, and oxidative stress in soil organisms.
The comparison effect on earthworms between conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on earthworms over an extended exposure period. They found that biodegradable microplastics caused comparable or even greater harm than conventional plastics at certain concentrations, including reduced growth and reproduction. The findings challenge the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for soil organisms.
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei using an eight-week reproduction test across seven concentration levels. Both polymer types affected earthworm survival, reproduction, and oxidative stress markers, raising questions about whether biodegradable alternatives pose similar soil ecosystem risks.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.