We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Short- and medium-term effects of biodegradable microplastics (PLA and PHB) on earthworm development and reproduction
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested whether biodegradable plastics (PLA and PHB) are truly safer for soil organisms than conventional polyethylene by exposing earthworms to all three types of microplastics. While none caused immediate harm or death, both PLA and conventional polyethylene reduced earthworm reproduction over medium-term exposure, producing fewer cocoons and offspring. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally harmless and suggests they may pose similar risks to soil ecosystems as conventional plastics.
Microplastics derived from biobased and biodegradable materials will increase their presence in soils as their use becomes more widespread. Research into their effects on soil fauna will help to ensure a better understanding of their environmental impacts. The aim of this work was to study the effects on the development of the earthworm Eisenia andrei (ingestion capacity, survival, growth, cocoon, and hatchling production), earthworm lysosomal stability through the neutral red retention time (NRTT), and substrate enzymatic activity of dehydrogenase (DHA) and fluorescein diacetate-hydrolysing activity (FDA) in the presence of polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polyethylene (PE) microplastics in laboratory tests. Three different tests were designed, one feeding test of 4 days, and two medium-term tests with 49 and 112 days. The 4-day test and the 49-day growth test were carried out using OECD artificial soil, while in the 112-day growth test, vermicompost was used as the substrate. PLA and PHB particle ingestion was demonstrated. No concentration or polymer-dependent lysosomal damage or effects on earthworm growth were observed. However, reproductive effects, such as a decrease in cocoon production and the number of juveniles, were reported upon exposure to PE and PLA during medium-term assays. These findings indicated that the toxicity of PLA bioplastic exposure is comparable to that of conventional plastic PE concerning the negative effects on the reproductive efficiency of the detritivorous earthworm E. andrei.
More Papers Like This
The comparison effect on earthworms between conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on earthworms over an extended exposure period. They found that biodegradable microplastics caused comparable or even greater harm than conventional plastics at certain concentrations, including reduced growth and reproduction. The findings challenge the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for soil organisms.
Reassessing Whether Biodegradable Microplastics Are Environmentally Friendly: Differences in Earthworm Physiological Responses and Soil Carbon Function Impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the toxic effects of conventional (PP, PS) and biodegradable (PLA, PHA) microplastics on earthworm physiology and soil carbon function in haplic phaeozem soil. Biodegradable MPs were not environmentally friendly — PLA and PHA caused comparable or greater physiological stress in earthworms and disrupted soil carbon cycling to a similar degree as conventional plastics.
Different mulch films, consistent results: soil fauna responses to microplastic
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PLA/PBAT microplastics affect earthworms and springtails in soil over 28 days. Neither plastic type significantly harmed reproduction, but subtle cellular stress responses were detected, and the effects were similar for both conventional and biodegradable plastics, suggesting that biodegradable alternatives may not be safer for soil organisms.
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei using an eight-week reproduction test across seven concentration levels. Both polymer types affected earthworm survival, reproduction, and oxidative stress markers, raising questions about whether biodegradable alternatives pose similar soil ecosystem risks.
Ecotoxicological effects of soil microplastic types and concentrations on earthworms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested the effects of conventional polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics alongside biodegradable PBAT microplastics on earthworms over 28 days. They found that PP microplastics caused significant mortality at the highest concentration, while PBAT, despite being marketed as biodegradable, induced the highest levels of DNA damage and cellular stress. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily less harmful to soil organisms than conventional plastics.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.