0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Different mulch films, consistent results: soil fauna responses to microplastic

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2024 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Antonia Weltmeyer Antonia Weltmeyer Antonia Weltmeyer Antonia Weltmeyer Martina Roß‐Nickoll, Martina Roß‐Nickoll, Martina Roß‐Nickoll, Antonia Weltmeyer

Summary

Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PLA/PBAT microplastics affect earthworms and springtails in soil over 28 days. Neither plastic type significantly harmed reproduction, but subtle cellular stress responses were detected, and the effects were similar for both conventional and biodegradable plastics, suggesting that biodegradable alternatives may not be safer for soil organisms.

Agricultural activities contribute to plastic pollution, with unintentional introduction and intentional use of plastic mulch films leading to the accumulation of microplastic particles in soils. The lack of removal techniques and scarce information on the effects on soil organisms, especially for biodegradable mulch films, necessitate an assessment of potential effects. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of mulch film microplastic on soil fauna by investigating reproduction output and subcellular responses before and after recovery from exposure. Two common soil organisms, Folsomia candida and Eisenia fetida, were exposed to petroleum-based polyethylene (PE) and biodegradable polylactic acid/polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PLA/PBAT) microplastic for 28 days, according to OECD guidelines 232 and 222, respectively. Juvenile numbers revealed no polymer- or concentration-dependent effects on E. fetida and F. candida reproduction after exposure to up to 5 and 10 g/kg soil, respectively. To provide a more sensitive and early indication of sublethal effects, subcellular responses in E. fetida were analyzed. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity increased with rising microplastic concentration; however, catalase (CAT), acetylcholine esterase (AChE) activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) did not differ from control levels. Further, the more environmentally relevant PE polymer was chosen for in-depth assessment of subcellular response after 28-day microplastic exposure and subsequent 28 days in uncontaminated soil with E. fetida. No significant differences in biomarker activity and stress levels were observed. We conclude that mulch film-derived microplastic did not adversely affect earthworm and collembolan species in this scenario, except for a slight induction in the detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper