We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Diverse PerspectivesIlluminate the Intestinal Toxicityof Traditional and Biodegradable Agricultural Film Microplastics to Eisenia fetida under Varying Exposure Sequences
Summary
Researchers compared intestinal toxicity of traditional plastic agricultural films and biodegradable alternatives across multiple biological perspectives, finding that both types caused gut damage through oxidative stress and inflammation, with biodegradable MPs showing distinct but not necessarily safer toxicity profiles.
The widespread use of plastic agricultural films necessitates a thorough evaluation of environmental risks posed by soil microplastics (MPs). While the intestinal tract is a critical site for MP interactions in soil organisms, current research predominantly focuses on overall physiological responses, overlooking organ-specific toxic mechanisms. To address this gap, we exposed earthworms (Eisenia fetida) to polyethylene (PE) and biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) MPs sourced from agricultural films at an environmentally realistic concentration of 1.0 g/kg. Incorporating natural earthworm mobility, we designed two exposure scenarios: migration from clean to contaminated soil (scenario A) and vice versa (scenario B). Machine learning-driven image analysis and phenotypic profiling revealed that PE induced more severe intestinal lesions than PLA, adversely affecting intestinal immune functions. Furthermore, PE resulted in greater oxidative damage and significantly activated immune proteins such as melanin and antimicrobial peptides through reprograming immune-related gene and protein pathways. Conversely, PLA predominantly disrupted intestinal digestive and absorptive functions, though the gut microbial community partially mitigated damage through structural and compositional adaptation. Compared with scenario A, earthworms in scenario B exhibited reduced tissue damage, enhanced digestive enzyme activity, and upregulated energy-related metabolites and cell proliferation genes, indicating partial recovery from MP-induced intestinal dysfunction. These findings elucidate the distinct toxicity mechanisms of conventional and biodegradable agricultural MPs on soil organisms, while the scenario-based approach advances risk assessment by aligning experimental design with real-world ecological behaviors.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Diverse Perspectives Illuminate the Intestinal Toxicity of Traditional and Biodegradable Agricultural Film Microplastics to Eisenia fetida under Varying Exposure Sequences
Researchers compared how traditional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics from agricultural films affect earthworm intestines. Regular polyethylene caused more severe gut damage and immune disruption than the biodegradable alternative, though PLA still impaired digestive function. This matters because earthworms are essential for soil health, and damage to them from agricultural plastic film fragments could reduce soil quality and affect the crops humans depend on for food.
Effects of biodegradable and conventional microplastics on the intestine, intestinal community composition, and metabolic levels in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)
Researchers exposed tilapia fish to both biodegradable (PLA) and conventional (PVC) microplastics for 14 days and compared the effects on their intestines and gut bacteria. Both types of microplastics caused intestinal inflammation and disrupted the gut microbial community, though the specific effects differed between the two plastic types. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics may not be substantially safer for aquatic life than conventional ones.
Response of terrestrial crustacean Porcellio scaber and mealworm Tenebrio molitor to non-degradable and biodegradable fossil-based mulching film microplastics
Researchers tested how two soil organisms, woodlice and mealworms, responded to microplastics from both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable mulching films used in farming. Both types of microplastics affected the organisms' gut bacteria and caused stress, though the effects varied by plastic type. The study challenges the assumption that biodegradable farm films are completely safe, since their microplastic fragments can still harm soil organisms important for healthy agricultural ecosystems.
Toxicity comparison of multiple biodegradable and conventional microplastics on earthworms: Ingestion, tissue damage, oxidative stress, and transcriptional responses
This study compared the toxicity of four biodegradable microplastics and conventional polyethylene microplastics on earthworms across multiple biological endpoints. Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics caused tissue damage, oxidative stress, and altered gene expression at levels comparable to or sometimes exceeding conventional plastics, challenging the assumption that biodegradable alternatives are inherently safer for soil organisms.
Impact of Conventional vs. Biodegradable and Compostable Microplastics on Eisenia fetida S.: An Ecopathological Approach
Researchers compared the effects of biodegradable and conventional polyethylene microplastics on soil-dwelling earthworms and found that both types caused increased mortality, decreased biomass, and tissue damage after 14 days of exposure. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics are not necessarily safer than conventional ones, and that detailed tissue analysis can reveal harmful sublethal effects not captured by standard toxicity tests.