Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Impact of Conventional vs. Biodegradable and Compostable Microplastics on <scp> <i>Eisenia fetida</i> </scp> S.: An Ecopathological Approach

Environmental Toxicology 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Giorgia Santini, Karen Power, Karen Power, Giorgia Santini, Giorgia Santini, Giorgia Santini, Giorgia Santini, Giorgia Santini, Giorgia Santini, Lorenzo Riccio, Giorgia Santini, Lorenzo Riccio, Antonietta Siciliano, Lucia Santorufo, Lorenzo Riccio, Antonietta Siciliano, Lucia Santorufo, Antonietta Siciliano, Antonietta Siciliano, Lucia Santorufo, Lucia Santorufo, Lucia Santorufo, Lucia Santorufo, Antonietta Siciliano, Giorgia Santini, Luigi Rosati, Lucia Santorufo, Luigi Rosati, Antonietta Siciliano, Simone Landi, Lucia Santorufo, Lucia Santorufo, Simone Landi, Antonietta Siciliano, Lorenzo Riccio, Lorenzo Riccio, Antonietta Siciliano, Lucia Santorufo, Lucia Santorufo, Salvatore Avilia, Salvatore Avilia, Salvatore Avilia, Salvatore Avilia, Lorenzo Riccio, Salvatore Avilia, Rebecca Leandri, Salvatore Avilia, Rebecca Leandri, Carmine Vitagliano, Carmine Vitagliano, Carmine Vitagliano, Carmine Vitagliano, Carmine Vitagliano, Carmine Vitagliano, Rebecca Leandri, Giorgia Santini, Giorgia Santini, Antonietta Siciliano, Gionata De Vico, Gionata De Vico, Gionata De Vico, Giulia Maisto, Giulia Maisto

Summary

Researchers compared the effects of biodegradable and conventional polyethylene microplastics on soil-dwelling earthworms and found that both types caused increased mortality, decreased biomass, and tissue damage after 14 days of exposure. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics are not necessarily safer than conventional ones, and that detailed tissue analysis can reveal harmful sublethal effects not captured by standard toxicity tests.

Polymers

HDPE PE

Body Systems

Immune Integumentary Musculoskeletal

Models

Invertebrate other

Microplastics represent an emerging issue endangering all ecosystems including soils, where the impact of both conventional and biobased ones remains controversial. The study aimed to assess the effects of two concentrations (1% and 2%) of biodegradable and compostable microplastics and conventional high-density polyethylene microplastics on the abiotic properties of soil, and the ecotoxicological and ecopathological impacts on Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) through histological techniques. Analyses conducted on the evaluation of abiotic soil parameters after 28 days of exposure did not show any significant change compared to the control samples. Ecotoxicological results showed increased mortality and decreased biomass across all treated groups after 14 days of exposure, while a significant reduction in offspring was only observed in 1%-biodegradable and compostable microplastics. Ecopathological analysis revealed inflammatory and/or degenerative phenomena in the epidermal and muscular layers in all treated groups after 14 days of exposure, suggesting the presence of sublethal effects which could impair the well-being of individuals. Overall, our results suggest that the ecopathological approach combined with the classical ecotoxicological one can help explain pathological events which are behind the ecotoxicological endpoints and underline the existence of fine tissue and cell damage even when no changes are observed during ecotoxicological studies.

Read via DOI PubMed

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email