0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Sorption and desorption of petroleum hydrocarbons on biodegradable and nondegradable microplastics

Chemosphere 2020 106 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiaowei Song, Xiao‐Feng Wu, Xiaoping Song, Cuijie Shi, Zhengdong Zhang

Summary

Researchers compared sorption and desorption of petroleum hydrocarbons on six microplastic types including both biodegradable polylactic acid and five nondegradable polymers, finding that sorption kinetics followed pseudo-second-order models indicating chemical sorption dominance. The study identified intraparticle diffusion and liquid film diffusion as key rate-controlling steps, with differences between biodegradable and nondegradable microplastics in their hydrocarbon-carrying capacity.

Both biodegradable and nondegradable plastics are widely used. However, their interactions with petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) have not been sufficiently studied. In this study, a type of biodegradable [polylactic acid (PLA)] and five types of nondegradable microplastics [polyamide (PA), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC)] were selected to investigate the sorption and desorption mechanisms of PHs. The sorption kinetics of the six types of microplastics followed a pseudo-second-order kinetics model (R ranged from 0.956 to 0.999) and indicated that chemical sorption dominated the sorption process. The key rate-controlling steps of the sorption of PHs on microplastics were intraparticle diffusion and liquid film diffusion. The sorption capacity of PHs on microplastics followed the order of PA > PE > PS > PET > PLA > PVC. The difference in sorption capacity might be due to the crystallinity, and rubber or glass state of the microplastics. In addition, all types of microplastics exhibited reversible sorption without noticeable desorption hysteresis. No obvious differences were observed in the sorption and desorption of PHs between biodegradable and nondegradable microplastics. Both biodegradable and nondegradable microplastics could sorb/desorb PHs and serve as transportation vectors.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Adsorption behavior of crude oil hydrocarbons on polyethylene microplastics in batch experiments

Researchers conducted batch experiments to measure how crude oil hydrocarbons adsorb onto polyethylene microplastics of 300-600 µm size under environmentally relevant conditions. Hydrocarbon adsorption followed pseudo-second-order kinetics and was influenced by oil composition, with lighter fractions showing faster initial uptake, suggesting PE microplastics can act as vectors for oil pollution in spill scenarios.

Article Tier 2

Adsorption of pesticides and personal care products on pristine and weathered microplastics in the marine environment. Comparison between bio-based and conventional plastics

Researchers compared adsorption of two pesticides and six synthetic musks onto bio-based polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and conventional polyamide (PA6) microplastics under pristine and weathered conditions. Weathering increased adsorption capacity for both polymer types, and bio-based PHB adsorbed pollutants at comparable rates to conventional PA6, suggesting biodegradable plastics are not automatically safer as environmental vectors.

Article Tier 2

Comparative evaluation of sorption kinetics and isotherms of pyrene onto microplastics

This study compared how quickly and how much pyrene — a common polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon — is absorbed by different types of microplastics in aquatic environments. The results indicate that microplastic polymer type significantly affects how well it concentrates and potentially transports toxic organic chemicals.

Article Tier 2

Sorption of five organic compounds by polar and nonpolar microplastics

Polar and biodegradable microplastics, including polyurethane and polycaprolactone, showed significant sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants, with hydrogen bonding playing a greater role than for conventional nonpolar plastics. The findings extend understanding of how a wider range of plastic types can act as vectors for environmental pollutants.

Article Tier 2

Sorption and dissipation of current-use pesticides and personal-care products on high-density polyethylene microplastics in seawater

Researchers characterized how three pesticides and three personal care products sorb onto high-density polyethylene microplastics in seawater. They found that more hydrophobic compounds accumulated more readily on the plastic, and that significant desorption (over 30%) occurred within 24 hours, especially at higher contaminant concentrations. The study confirms that microplastics can act as both carriers and releasers of chemical pollutants in marine environments.

Share this paper