0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Remediation Sign in to save

A New Method for Microplastics Identification in Copepods

Frontiers in Environmental Chemistry 2022 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jérémy Thery, Rachid Amara Jérémy Thery, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Samira Benali, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Samira Benali, Samira Benali, Capucine Bialais, Capucine Bialais, Capucine Bialais, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Capucine Bialais, Sami Souissi, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Samira Benali, Jérémy Thery, Samira Benali, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Samira Benali, Jérémy Thery, Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Maria Kazour, Rachid Amara Dylan Dufour, Rachid Amara Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Dylan Dufour, Sami Souissi, Rachid Amara Maria Kazour, Maria Kazour, Samira Benali, Jérémy Thery, Samira Benali, Rachid Amara Sébastien Monchy, Myriam Moreau, Myriam Moreau, Rachid Amara Jérémy Thery, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Samira Benali, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Dylan Dufour, Myriam Moreau, Dylan Dufour, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Samira Benali, Samira Benali, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Jean‐Marie Raquez, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Samira Benali, Sébastien Monchy, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Jean‐Marie Raquez, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Sami Souissi, Rachid Amara Sami Souissi, Rachid Amara Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Sami Souissi, Rachid Amara Sébastien Monchy, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Sébastien Monchy, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Jean‐Marie Raquez, Sami Souissi, Sami Souissi, Sébastien Monchy, Rachid Amara Sami Souissi, Maria Kazour, Rachid Amara Jean‐Marie Raquez, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Capucine Bialais, Capucine Bialais, Sami Souissi, Maria Kazour, Rachid Amara

Summary

Researchers developed and validated methods to identify small microplastics (under 10 micrometers) in the copepod Eurytemora affinis using epifluorescence microscopy and Raman microspectroscopy. The study used labeled polystyrene, polyethylene, and nylon particles to calibrate the detection methods. Improved identification of small microplastics in zooplankton is important for understanding plastic entry into marine food webs.

This study investigates several methods to identify microplastics (MPs) of small size ranges (<10 µm) in the copepod Eurytemora affinis collected in the Seine estuary (France) and identified using epifluorescence microscopy and Raman microspectroscopy. In order to calibrate the methodology, copepods obtained from cultures were used. Firstly, we labelled three types of MPs (i.e., Polystyrene, Polyethylene, and Polylactic acid) with Nile Red and confirmed their ingestion by E. affinis with epifluorescence microscopy. Considering the convenient detection of Nile Red labelled MPs using epifluorescence observation, we tried to pair this method with Raman microspectroscopy. For this, we developed an enzymatic digestion method consisting of copepods digestion using Proteinase K followed by sonication in order to fragment their cuticle. The lysate was then vacuum filtered on black polycarbonate membrane filters that were the most appropriate for epifluorescence microscopy. Potential MPs were dyed with Nile Red directly on the filter, which allowed a relatively rapid visual detection. However, results showed that black polycarbonate membrane filters induced a significant background fluorescence during Raman identification of MPs and hence particles smaller than 10 µm could not be characterized. In this case, we were not able to link staining method with micro-Raman for the size range of MPs targeted in this study. Thus, aluminum oxide filters were tested, and staining method was replaced by a classical observation with stereomicroscopic magnifier to delimit areas of observation for Raman microscopic identification. Aluminum oxide filters induced less fluorescence, allowing the detection of MPs (as small as 1 µm diameter) on copepods from laboratory cultures exposed with MPs. We applied this method on copepods collected in the natural environment. Within a pool of 20 copepods of three replicates, we identified 17 MPs (average of 0.28 MPs/copepod) composed of eight different polymer types and six colors. These MPs corresponded to 59% of fibres with 14.1 ± 9.4 µm diameter and 391.6 ± 600.4 µm length along with 41% of fragments with an average diameter of 13.2 µm ± 9.5 µm. This study reports a novel approach to detect the presence of small particles of MPs ingested by copepods in the natural environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper