We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polystyrene (PS) microplastics differently affect the gut microbiota of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) after individual and combined exposure with sulfamethazine
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how three types of microplastics — bio-based polylactic acid (PLA), and petroleum-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polystyrene (PS) — affect the gut microbiota of marine medaka fish, both individually and combined with the antibiotic sulfamethazine. The study found that petroleum-based microplastics significantly reduced gut microbial diversity and network complexity, while bio-based PLA had milder effects, suggesting that polymer origin influences the ecological impact of microplastics on fish gut health.
Microplastics and the antibiotic sulfamethazine (SMZ) are two prevalent pollutants in regions with high human activity, particularly in coastal marine environments. In this study, the individual and joint effects of microplastics (i.e., the bio-based microplastics polylactic acid (PLA), the petroleum-based microplastics polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and the petroleum-based microplastics polystyrene (PS) at 0.5 and 5 mg/g) and sulfamethazine (SMZ, at 5 mg/g) on the gut microbiota of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) via dietary route were investigated. For the individual microplastics exposure, two petroleum-based microplastics PET and PS significantly decreased the alpha diversity and the complexity of co-occurrence networks of gut microbiota. Differently, the adverse effects caused by the bio-based microplastic PLA were more modest, suggesting that PLA was less hazardous than PET and PS. For the combined exposure, SMZ alone dramatically impaired the homeostasis of gut microbiota by decreasing the alpha diversity and the complexity of co-occurrence networks, while the presence of PLA or PET alleviated these adverse effects caused by SMZ. Interestingly, such an alleviation effect was not observed in the SMZ + PS groups, suggesting that different types of microplastics might exhibit distinct joint effects with SMZ. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the ecological risk of different types of microplastics to marine ecosystems, especially in a scenario of combined pollution with antibiotics.
More Papers Like This
Effects of biodegradable and conventional microplastics on the intestine, intestinal community composition, and metabolic levels in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed tilapia fish to both biodegradable (PLA) and conventional (PVC) microplastics for 14 days and compared the effects on their intestines and gut bacteria. Both types of microplastics caused intestinal inflammation and disrupted the gut microbial community, though the specific effects differed between the two plastic types. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics may not be substantially safer for aquatic life than conventional ones.
Polystyrene microplastics induce gut microbiome and metabolome changes in Javanese medaka fish (Oryzias javanicus Bleeker, 1854)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that polystyrene microplastic exposure altered gut microbiome composition and metabolic profiles in Javanese medaka fish, with effects on amino acid and lipid metabolism pathways suggesting microplastics can disrupt gut health in aquatic organisms.
Network analysis reveals significant joint effects of microplastics and tetracycline on the gut than the gill microbiome of marine medaka
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used network analysis to study the joint effects of polystyrene microplastics and the antibiotic tetracycline on the gut and gill microbiomes of marine medaka fish over 30 days. The study found that combined exposure had more profound effects on the gut than the gill microbiome, reducing the complexity and stability of gut microbial networks.
Surface functional groups on nanoplastics delay the recovery of gut microbiota after combined exposure to sulfamethazine in marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that surface-modified nanoplastics (with carboxyl or amino groups) delayed the recovery of gut microbiota in marine medaka fish after combined exposure with the antibiotic sulfamethazine, compared to plain polystyrene nanoplastics. The modified nanoplastics were expelled more slowly from the fish and released more of the adsorbed antibiotic during digestion. The study suggests that real-world nanoplastics, which typically carry surface functional groups from environmental weathering, may pose greater risks to gut health than pristine particles.
Different effects of nano- and microplastics on oxidative status and gut microbiota in the marine medaka Oryzias melastigma
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of nanoplastics and microplastics on oxidative stress and gut microbiota in marine medaka fish. They found that nanoplastics caused more severe oxidative damage and greater disruption to the gut microbial community than larger microplastic particles. The study suggests that particle size plays a critical role in determining the biological impact of plastic pollution on aquatic organisms.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.