0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polystyrene (PS) microplastics differently affect the gut microbiota of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) after individual and combined exposure with sulfamethazine

Aquatic Toxicology 2023 28 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Chaoyue Zhang, Jingli Mu Yu Zhang, Yu Zhang, Chaoyue Zhang, Faguang Li, Faguang Li, Jingli Mu Faguang Li, Xiaofan Liu, Chaoyue Zhang, Lingtian Xie, Chaoyue Zhang, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Faguang Li, Yu Zhang, Faguang Li, Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Xiaofan Liu, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Lingtian Xie, Lingtian Xie, Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Yu Zhang, Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu

Summary

Researchers compared how three types of microplastics — bio-based polylactic acid (PLA), and petroleum-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polystyrene (PS) — affect the gut microbiota of marine medaka fish, both individually and combined with the antibiotic sulfamethazine. The study found that petroleum-based microplastics significantly reduced gut microbial diversity and network complexity, while bio-based PLA had milder effects, suggesting that polymer origin influences the ecological impact of microplastics on fish gut health.

Microplastics and the antibiotic sulfamethazine (SMZ) are two prevalent pollutants in regions with high human activity, particularly in coastal marine environments. In this study, the individual and joint effects of microplastics (i.e., the bio-based microplastics polylactic acid (PLA), the petroleum-based microplastics polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and the petroleum-based microplastics polystyrene (PS) at 0.5 and 5 mg/g) and sulfamethazine (SMZ, at 5 mg/g) on the gut microbiota of marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) via dietary route were investigated. For the individual microplastics exposure, two petroleum-based microplastics PET and PS significantly decreased the alpha diversity and the complexity of co-occurrence networks of gut microbiota. Differently, the adverse effects caused by the bio-based microplastic PLA were more modest, suggesting that PLA was less hazardous than PET and PS. For the combined exposure, SMZ alone dramatically impaired the homeostasis of gut microbiota by decreasing the alpha diversity and the complexity of co-occurrence networks, while the presence of PLA or PET alleviated these adverse effects caused by SMZ. Interestingly, such an alleviation effect was not observed in the SMZ + PS groups, suggesting that different types of microplastics might exhibit distinct joint effects with SMZ. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the ecological risk of different types of microplastics to marine ecosystems, especially in a scenario of combined pollution with antibiotics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper