We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effect of bio-based microplastics on earthworms Eisenia andrei
Summary
Researchers tested the effects of three innovative bio-based plastics on earthworms in long-term soil experiments to determine whether these alternatives to conventional plastics are safer for terrestrial ecosystems. They found that bio-based microplastics still affected earthworm health and behavior, though the severity varied depending on the type of polymer. The study suggests that switching from petroleum-based to bio-based plastics does not automatically eliminate risks to soil organisms.
The contribution of bio-based plastics in the global market is gradually growing and diversifying. Therefore, it is necessary to assess their environmental impact including the biotic parts of ecosystems. Earthworms are regarded as functionally essential and useful bioindicators of ecological disturbances in the terrestrial ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of three innovative bio-based plastics on earthworms Eisenia andrei in the long-term experiments. It comprised the mortality, body mass and reproduction ability of earthworms as well as the oxidative stress response. Regarding the latter the activities of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) involved in the antioxidant system of earthworms were determined. Two out of three bio-based materials tested were polylactic acid-based (PLA-based) plastics, while one was poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate)-based (PHBV-based) plastic. Neither mortality nor weight of adult earthworms was affected even at high concentration of the bio-based plastics up to 12.5 % w/w in the soil. Reproduction ability occurred to be more sensitive endpoint than mortality or body mass. At the concentration of 12.5 % w/w each of the studied bio-based plastics contributed to the decrease of the earthworm reproduction at statistically significant level. PLA-based plastics exerted stronger effect on earthworm reproduction ability than PHBV-based plastic did. CAT activity turned out to be a good indicator of the cellular response against oxidative stress induced by bio-based plastics in earthworms. The activity of this enzyme increased in the response to the exposure to the bio-based plastics compared to the level achieved in the control tests. It was from 16 % to about 84 % dependent on the material tested and its concentration in the soil. Finally, the reproduction ability and catalase activity are recommended to be used in the evaluation of the potential impacts of bio-based plastics on earthworms.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei
Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei using an eight-week reproduction test across seven concentration levels. Both polymer types affected earthworm survival, reproduction, and oxidative stress markers, raising questions about whether biodegradable alternatives pose similar soil ecosystem risks.
A comparison of the toxicity induced by the exposure to microplastics made of a conventional and a biodegradable polymer on the earthworm Eisenia fetida
Researchers compared the toxicity of conventional versus biodegradable polymer microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia fetida, evaluating whether biodegradable alternatives present reduced ecotoxicological risk in soil environments where microplastic contamination is increasingly documented.
Reproduction, metabolic enzyme activity, and metabolomics in earthworms Eisenia fetida exposed to different polymer microplastics
Researchers exposed earthworms to microplastics from three different polymer types, including both conventional and biodegradable plastics, at environmentally relevant concentrations. They found that polypropylene microplastics had the most pronounced effects on reproduction and metabolic enzyme activity, while biodegradable plastics also disrupted earthworm metabolism. The study demonstrates that different plastic polymers pose varying levels of risk to soil-dwelling organisms.
Comparison of the potential toxicity induced by microplastics made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polylactic acid (PLA) on the earthworm Eisenia foetida
Researchers compared the toxicity of microplastics made from conventional PET plastic and biodegradable PLA plastic on earthworms. Surprisingly, the supposedly eco-friendly PLA particles caused more harm than PET, triggering oxidative stress, tissue damage, and behavioral changes in the worms. This challenges the assumption that bioplastics are always safer for soil organisms than traditional plastics.
Impact of Conventional vs. Biodegradable and Compostable Microplastics on Eisenia fetida S.: An Ecopathological Approach
Researchers compared the effects of biodegradable and conventional polyethylene microplastics on soil-dwelling earthworms and found that both types caused increased mortality, decreased biomass, and tissue damage after 14 days of exposure. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics are not necessarily safer than conventional ones, and that detailed tissue analysis can reveal harmful sublethal effects not captured by standard toxicity tests.