0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Reproduction, metabolic enzyme activity, and metabolomics in earthworms Eisenia fetida exposed to different polymer microplastics

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiaoxia Yang, Junjie Lin, Xiaoxia Yang, Jie Ma Jie Ma Xiaoxia Yang, Xiaoxia Yang, Junjie Lin, Junjie Lin, Xuemei Zhang, Xiaoxia Yang, Xuemei Zhang, Jie Ma Xiaoxia Yang, Xuemei Zhang, Xuemei Zhang, Xiaoxia Yang, Xiao Shu, Xiao Shu, Xiao Shu, Xiao Shu, Junjie Lin, Jie Ma Jie Ma Jie Ma Jiuping Gong, Manli Xie, Manli Xie, Manli Xie, Jiuping Gong, Jie Ma Manli Xie, Manli Xie, Manli Xie, Jie Ma Jie Ma Jie Ma Jie Ma Jiuping Gong, Jiuping Gong, Xuemei Zhang, Jiuping Gong, Jiuping Gong, Junjie Lin, Fan Yang, Jie Ma Jie Ma Jie Ma Xiaoxia Yang, Jiuping Gong, Jie Ma Jie Ma Jiuping Gong, Xiaoxia Yang, Jie Ma Junjie Lin, Junjie Lin, Jie Ma Yingkui Li, Xiaoxia Yang, Jie Ma Jie Ma Yingkui Li, Jie Ma Jie Ma Junjie Lin, Junjie Lin, Junjie Lin, Jianrong Kai, Jianrong Kai, Jie Ma Yingkui Li, Junjie Lin, Jie Ma

Summary

Researchers exposed earthworms to microplastics from three different polymer types, including both conventional and biodegradable plastics, at environmentally relevant concentrations. They found that polypropylene microplastics had the most pronounced effects on reproduction and metabolic enzyme activity, while biodegradable plastics also disrupted earthworm metabolism. The study demonstrates that different plastic polymers pose varying levels of risk to soil-dwelling organisms.

Plastics degradation generates microplastics (MPs), posing a risk to soil function and organisms. Currently, the impact of MPs derived from different polymers remains poorly understood. In this study, the effects of three polymers (polypropylene (PP), polylactic acid (PLA), and polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)) were investigated at environmentally relevant levels (0, 0. 5, 2.5, and 10 g/kg) on the growth, reproduction, metabolic enzyme activities (CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, SOD, and CAT), and metabolomics of earthworm Eisenia fetida during a 28-day exposure period. The presence of smaller plastic particles inside earthworms (<62 µm), and polymer-specific and concentration-dependent effects on earthworms were observed. Compared with the controls, both PBAT (2.5-10 g/kg) and PLA (10 g/kg) significantly inhibited earthworm reproductive output, measured as the sum of cocoons and young earthworms, caused significant alterations in the majority of the top fifteen most important metabolites (such as arachidic acid, fumaric acid, L-malic acid, myo-inositol, cytosine, and deoxyinosine), and inhibited the activities most tested enzymes. The highest PP concentration (10 g/kg) only significantly changed the levels of (9Z,11E,15Z)-(13S)-hydroperoxyoctadeca-9,11,15-trienoate (13-HPOT), L-formylkynurenine, and kynurenine. Enzyme activity and metabolomics alterations indicated that all three types of MPs induced oxidative damage, neurotoxicity, immune-metabolic disorders, and disrupted lipid and tryptophan metabolism in earthworms, while PBAT and PLA also induced dysregulation of energy metabolism, purine and pyrimidine metabolism, and osmotic pressure regulation homeostasis. PBAT MPs exhibited the strongest toxicity, with adverse effects observed at the lowest tested concentration.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper