0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei using an eight-week reproduction test across seven concentration levels. Both polymer types affected earthworm survival, reproduction, and oxidative stress markers, raising questions about whether biodegradable alternatives pose similar soil ecosystem risks.

Microplastic (MP) contamination of soils has become a critical environmental concern. Conventional plastics are mainly used in agricultural practices, but the use of biodegradable materials has increased. However, the effects of these polymers on the environment are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the ecotoxicological effects of mulching film-based microplastics, conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs), and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics (PBAT-BD-MPs) on the earthworm Eisenia andrei. The measured parameters were survival, reproduction, growth, and oxidative stress. The experimental setup included a standard eight-week earthworm reproduction test with seven different microplastic concentrations (0 Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559482/document

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia andrei

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the ecotoxicological effects of conventional low-density polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) and biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate microplastics (PBAT-BD-MPs) on earthworms (Eisenia andrei) across a range of concentrations in an eight-week reproduction test. Both polymer types were assessed for impacts on survival, reproduction, growth, and oxidative stress in soil organisms.

Article Tier 2

A comparison of the toxicity induced by the exposure to microplastics made of a conventional and a biodegradable polymer on the earthworm Eisenia fetida

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the toxicity of conventional versus biodegradable polymer microplastics on the earthworm Eisenia fetida, evaluating whether biodegradable alternatives present reduced ecotoxicological risk in soil environments where microplastic contamination is increasingly documented.

Article Tier 2

Reproduction, metabolic enzyme activity, and metabolomics in earthworms Eisenia fetida exposed to different polymer microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed earthworms to microplastics from three different polymer types, including both conventional and biodegradable plastics, at environmentally relevant concentrations. They found that polypropylene microplastics had the most pronounced effects on reproduction and metabolic enzyme activity, while biodegradable plastics also disrupted earthworm metabolism. The study demonstrates that different plastic polymers pose varying levels of risk to soil-dwelling organisms.

Article Tier 2

Effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on earthworm Eisenia andrei in two generations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed earthworms (Eisenia andrei) to conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PBAT mulching film microplastics across two generations (7 months) and found that both types caused reproductive and growth effects, with impacts accumulating across generations under environmentally relevant concentrations.

Article Tier 2

Impact of Conventional vs. Biodegradable and Compostable Microplastics on Eisenia fetida S.: An Ecopathological Approach

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of biodegradable and conventional polyethylene microplastics on soil-dwelling earthworms and found that both types caused increased mortality, decreased biomass, and tissue damage after 14 days of exposure. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics are not necessarily safer than conventional ones, and that detailed tissue analysis can reveal harmful sublethal effects not captured by standard toxicity tests.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper