We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Impact of a nanofiltration system on microplastic contamination in Geneva groundwater (Switzerland)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in Geneva groundwater and the effectiveness of a nanofiltration treatment system. Surprisingly, they found that microplastic concentrations were higher in the nanofiltered water than in the raw groundwater, suggesting the treatment process itself may introduce plastic particles. The study highlights the need for further investigation into water treatment infrastructure as a potential source of microplastic contamination.
Microplastics (MPs) have been observed in the oceans, fresh waters, karstic water and remote water bodies. However, little is known on groundwater contamination, which is a natural resource of utmost importance for millions of people and is often perceived as a reliable source of water. Moreover, nanofiltration is perceived as a reliable technology to remove contaminants from water. In this study, large sample volumes of a silty-sandy gravel aquifer and the corresponding nanofiltered water were analysed for the presence of MPs (> 20 µm) using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy. Concentration in ground water was 8 ± 7 MPs/m and increased to 36 ± 11 MPs/m in nanofiltered water. All MPs had a maximum Ferret diameter lower than 500 µm. Size distribution of MPs was towards the small size class (20-50 µm). In groundwater, 33% of MPs were detected in the smallest size class (20-50 µm) and 67% in the 50-100-µm-size class. In comparison, around 52% of MPs in nanofiltered water were observed in the 20-50 µm size class. Moreover, 33% of the MPs observed in nanofiltered water were in the 50-100 µm size class and 15% in the 100-500-µm-size class. From a chemical point of view, different plastic polymers were identified in groundwater and in nanofiltered water, such as polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylene (vinyl acetate) copolymer (EVA), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and other polymer materials (such as polystyrene-based copolymers, vinyl-based copolymers). Fibres were observed in all samples, but only a small number of fibres (near 1%) were identified as PP synthetic fibres in nanofiltered water. Furthermore, no clear difference of fibre concentrations was observed between groundwater (232 ± 127 fibres/m) and nanofiltered water (247 ± 118 fibres/m). Groundwater had extremely low levels of microplastics, and although the nanofiltration effectively removes suspended particulate matter, it slightly contaminates the filtered water with MPs.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics detection and characterisation in the urban water cycle of Geneva, Switzerland: Assessing the supply network impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a comprehensive survey of microplastic contamination across Geneva's entire urban water cycle, from raw water sources through drinking water treatment to wastewater plant effluents. They found that conventional drinking water treatment removed 97% of microplastics, but the distribution network itself reintroduced contamination, increasing levels from 10 to roughly 25 particles per cubic meter. The study highlights that water supply infrastructure is an overlooked source of microplastic exposure for consumers.
Microplastic occurrence after conventional and nanofiltration processes at drinking water treatment plants: Preliminary results
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers detected microplastics in source river water and finished drinking water at three treatment plants in the Paris region, finding that standard treatment steps including coagulation-flocculation and sand filtration reduced but did not eliminate MPs. Nanofiltration achieved higher removal rates, suggesting advanced filtration is needed for near-complete MP removal from drinking water.
Microplastics transport during Managed Aquifer Recharge – A potential cause of groundwater contamination?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastics at multiple stages of a major managed aquifer recharge system in Switzerland and found that plastic particles from the Rhine River can penetrate through the treatment process into pumped groundwater, raising concerns about drinking water quality.
Contamination and removal efficiency of microplastics and synthetic fibres in a conventional drinking water treatment plant in Geneva, Switzerland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated microplastic removal efficiency at a large drinking water treatment plant in Geneva, finding that conventional treatment processes effectively reduced microplastic and synthetic fiber concentrations from Lake Geneva source water.
Contamination and Removal Efficiency of Microplastics and Synthetic Fibres in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that a conventional drinking water treatment plant in Geneva removed the majority of microplastics from raw water, with coagulation and sand filtration contributing most to removal, though some particles persisted through to finished drinking water.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.