0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastic removal efficiency and polymer characterization in coastal wastewater treatment plants using FTIR spectroscopy

Cleaner Water 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Vyoma Jani, Abeeb Oyelere, Basant Bhatt, Jianqiao Song, Kaushik Venkiteshwaran, Alexandra C. Stenson, Shenghua Wu

Summary

Researchers assessed microplastic concentrations and removal efficiencies at four wastewater treatment plants along the U.S. Gulf Coast, finding that influent contained an average of 3,472 particles per cubic meter while effluent contained 1,372. PET and polystyrene were the most abundant polymers, and plants with advanced filtration or lagoon-wetland systems achieved over 80% removal of these denser plastics, while lighter polymers like polyethylene were harder to capture. Seasonal patterns showed weaker removal during winter months.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic (MP) pollution in wastewater is a growing concern due to its environmental persistence and ecological toxicity. However, critical data on MPs in the Gulf Coast region of the United States is lacking. This study assessed MP concentrations, polymer types, and removal efficiencies in four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with distinct treatment technologies in the Gulf Coast region. Influent and effluent samples were collected from facilities in Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida, and processed using sequential filtration, peroxide digestion, density separation, and analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy. Results revealed that total MP concentrations ranged from 3,472 ± 2,012 particles/m³ in influent to 1,372 ± 1,740 particles/m³ in effluent, with the wide variability reflecting differences among treatment systems and seasonal sampling conditions. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) 37% and Polystyrene (PS) 27% were the most abundant polymers identified, followed by Polyethylene (PE) 21% and Polypropylene (PP) 13%. Polymer-specific removal varied by density and the treatment plant’s removal technology. PET and PS showed high removal (>80%) at sites with advanced filtration or lagoon-wetland systems, whereas PE and PP exhibited lower removal efficiencies (<60%). Seasonal trends showed higher loads and weaker removal in winter, while summer had lower loads, with over 90% removal. This study highlights the influence of polymer type and treatment technology on MP removal and underscores the importance of tailored strategies for MP removal. • Microplastic (MP) concentrations and polymer compositions were investigated across four Gulf Coast wastewater treatment plants. • Average influent and effluent concentrations were 3,472 and 1,372 particles·m⁻³, with ~60% overall removal efficiency, with the observed differences depending on the type of treatment configuration. • PET and PS dominated, while low-density PE/PP showed poor removal, indicating buoyancy-driven persistence. • Advanced BNR and disk filtration achieved the highest and most stable MP removal among all treatment systems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Release of Microplastics from Urban Wastewater Treatment Plants to Aquatic Ecosystems in Acapulco, Mexico

Researchers evaluated microplastic presence and removal at three wastewater treatment plants in Acapulco, Mexico, using optical microscopy and FTIR spectroscopy to characterize particles retained on 38-micron and 150-micron filters. The plants removed 82.5-98.7% of microplastics from influent streams, yet still released millions of microplastic particles daily into aquatic ecosystems, with polyethylene, polypropylene, PET, and PVC as the dominant polymer types detected.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Estonian wastewater treatment plants: First evaluation of baseline concentrations and stage-wise removal efficiency

Researchers sampled six Estonian wastewater treatment plants to establish baseline microplastic concentrations in influents and effluents and assess stage-wise removal efficiency. At least 78% of microscopically identified MPs were confirmed by µFTIR spectroscopy, with at least 50% removed during secondary treatment, providing the first baseline data for Estonian WWTP microplastic discharge into the Baltic Sea.

Article Tier 2

Quantification of microplastic mass and removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying Focal Plane Array (FPA)-based Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) imaging

This study quantified microplastic mass and calculated removal rates at wastewater treatment plants, finding that while plants remove a large proportion of incoming microplastics, the residual discharge still represents a substantial ongoing input to receiving water bodies.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Influents and Effluents of Estonian Wastewater Treatment Plants

This Estonian study is the first systematic investigation of microplastic concentrations in both the influent and effluent of Estonian wastewater treatment plants, using continuous filtration sampling and FTIR spectroscopy. The research establishes baseline data for microplastic removal efficiency in Baltic state wastewater infrastructure, documenting how treatment reduces but does not eliminate microplastic discharge.

Article Tier 2

Microplastiche: classificazione, identificazione e rimozione all'interno degli impianti di trattamento delle acque reflue

This Italian-language paper reviews how microplastics are classified, identified using techniques like FTIR spectroscopy, and removed in wastewater treatment plants. Conventional treatment plants remove a substantial portion of microplastics but still allow many particles to pass through into the environment. The review calls for better treatment technologies and standardized methods to assess microplastic removal efficiency.

Share this paper