0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Comparative toxicity of conventional and biodegradable microplastics to the marine algae Chlorella vulgaris: a critical review

Emerging contaminants 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mahima Ranjan Acharjee, Angan Sen, Tanzila Gias, Aporna Rani Nath, Md Mostafa Jalal, Yeaman Hossain, Md. Sagor Khan, Md Arman Hossain, Ravi Bhatta, Shuvashish Chanda, Chiara Bordin, Chiara Bordin, Paolo Pastorino, Md. Abdullah Al Mamun Hridoy

Summary

This review of existing research found that "biodegradable" plastic particles in the ocean are just as harmful to marine algae as regular plastic particles. Both types of tiny plastic pieces damage the algae that form the base of ocean food chains, and biodegradable plastics may actually break apart faster, creating more pollution. This matters because when ocean algae are harmed, it can affect the entire marine food web that humans depend on for seafood.

Microplastics (MPs), both conventional and biodegradable, are emerging contaminants of significant concern in marine ecosystems. While biodegradable plastics such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT) are marketed as eco-friendly alternatives, growing evidence suggests that their degradation products may exhibit comparable toxicity to conventional polymers like polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS). This review critically examines the physicochemical properties, degradation behavior, and ecotoxicological impacts of both biodegradable and conventional MPs on the marine microalga Chlorella vulgaris. The analysis highlights that both MP types inhibit algal growth, disrupt photosynthesis, and induce oxidative stress through reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, enzymatic imbalance, and cellular membrane damage. Mechanistic pathways involve particle aggregation, surface adsorption, and the release of toxic leachates and nano-sized derivatives, amplifying their ecological risks. Furthermore, biodegradable MPs often fragment faster, increasing MP particle counts and pollutant adsorption potential. The findings challenge the perceived environmental safety of “biodegradable” plastics and underscore the need for realistic field-based assessments. Understanding MP-algae interactions is crucial, as disruptions at this trophic level may cascade through marine food webs, affecting productivity and biogeochemical cycling. The review calls for comprehensive ecotoxicological frameworks to guide sustainable polymer design and effective marine pollution management.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable and conventional microplastics posed similar toxicity to marine algae Chlorella vulgaris

Researchers compared the toxicity of biodegradable microplastics made from polylactic acid and polybutylene succinate with conventional microplastics made from polyethylene and polyamide on marine algae. They found that both types inhibited algal growth and photosynthesis to a similar degree, causing comparable oxidative stress and cell membrane damage. The study challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for marine ecosystems than conventional plastics.

Article Tier 2

A review on fate and ecotoxicity of biodegradable microplastics in aquatic system: Are biodegradable plastics truly safe for the environment?

This review examines whether biodegradable plastics are truly safe for aquatic environments, finding that they can break down into microplastics faster than conventional plastics and cause comparable or even greater harm to algae, invertebrates, and fish. The findings suggest that switching to biodegradable plastics alone will not solve the microplastic pollution problem, and these particles can still enter the human food chain through contaminated seafood.

Article Tier 2

Molecular-level insights into the leachates released from ultraviolet-aged biodegradable and conventional commercial microplastics and their mechanism of toxicity toward Chlorella pyrenoidosa

Researchers compared leachates from UV-aged biodegradable and conventional microplastics and found that biodegradable plastics actually released several times more dissolved organic matter and nano-sized particles than traditional plastics. The leachates from biodegradable plastics also caused more gene changes and greater toxicity in algae. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally safer, suggesting they may release more harmful substances as they break down.

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Do Biodegradable Microplastics Threaten Chlorella spp.? First Study in Indonesia Using Leachate Exposure

This study tested whether leachates from biodegradable microplastics harm Chlorella algae, which form the base of aquatic food chains. The results showed that even plastics marketed as eco-friendly can release chemicals that impair algae growth at sublethal levels. This is concerning because damage to these microscopic organisms can ripple through the entire food web, potentially affecting the fish and shellfish people eat.

Clinical Trial Tier 1

Do Biodegradable Microplastics Threaten Chlorella spp.? First Study in Indonesia Using Leachate Exposure

This study investigated whether chemical leachates from biodegradable microplastics are toxic to Chlorella algae in Indonesian waters. The findings showed that even so-called biodegradable plastics release substances that can impair the growth of these foundational aquatic organisms. This raises questions about whether biodegradable plastics are truly safe alternatives, since their breakdown products can still harm the aquatic ecosystems that support fisheries and food production.

Share this paper