We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Biodegradable and conventional microplastics posed similar toxicity to marine algae Chlorella vulgaris
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the toxicity of biodegradable microplastics made from polylactic acid and polybutylene succinate with conventional microplastics made from polyethylene and polyamide on marine algae. They found that both types inhibited algal growth and photosynthesis to a similar degree, causing comparable oxidative stress and cell membrane damage. The study challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for marine ecosystems than conventional plastics.
It has been demonstrated that some conventional microplastics (CMPs) have toxicities to organisms, however, whether biodegradable microplastics (BMPs) have similar potential risks to marine ecosystems remains to be elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate i) the effects of CMPs (i. e., micro-sized polyethylene (mPE) and polyamide (mPA)) on marine algae Chlorella vulgaris; and ii) the potential effects of BMPs (i.e., micro-sized polylactic acid (mPLA) and polybutylene succinate (mPBS)) on C. vulgaris. The results showed that either CMPs or BMPs inhibited the growth of microalgae compared with the control. The maximum inhibition ratio of the four types of MPs on C. vulgaris were 47.24% (mPE, 1 000 mg/L), 40.36% (mPA, 100 mg/L), 47.95% (mPLA, 100 mg/L) and 34.25% (mPBS, 100 mg/L), respectively. Among them, mPLA showed the strongest inhibitory effect on the growth of C. vulgaris. Interestingly, the MPs can stimulate the contents of pigments (e.g., chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid), which may be acted as cellular defense to the stress induced by MPs. The results also showed that MPs stimulated the production of EPS. Under the investigated condition, the strongest inhibition on C. vulgaris was induced by mPLA, and followed by mPE, mPA, and mPBS. It was found that the factors such as the physicochemical properties of MPs (e.g., shading effect, the roughness of surface, the increase in potential), the chemical changes (i.e., the release of additives, the increase of oxidative stress) contributed to the inhibitory effects of MPs on microalgae, but the deciding factor remains to be further systematically explored.
More Papers Like This
Comparative toxicity of conventional and biodegradable microplastics to the marine algae Chlorella vulgaris: a critical review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review of existing research found that "biodegradable" plastic particles in the ocean are just as harmful to marine algae as regular plastic particles. Both types of tiny plastic pieces damage the algae that form the base of ocean food chains, and biodegradable plastics may actually break apart faster, creating more pollution. This matters because when ocean algae are harmed, it can affect the entire marine food web that humans depend on for seafood.
Distinct exposure impact of non-degradable and biodegradable microplastics on freshwater microalgae (Chlorella pyrenoidosa): Implications for polylactic acid as a sustainable plastic alternative
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared how aged biodegradable PLA microplastics and conventional polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics affect freshwater algae. While PLA caused milder stress and prompted algae to produce protective compounds, conventional plastics inhibited photosynthesis and caused more severe cellular damage. The findings suggest that PLA may be a genuinely less harmful alternative to traditional plastics for aquatic ecosystems, though it still causes some biological stress.
Molecular-level insights into the leachates released from ultraviolet-aged biodegradable and conventional commercial microplastics and their mechanism of toxicity toward Chlorella pyrenoidosa
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared leachates from UV-aged biodegradable and conventional microplastics and found that biodegradable plastics actually released several times more dissolved organic matter and nano-sized particles than traditional plastics. The leachates from biodegradable plastics also caused more gene changes and greater toxicity in algae. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally safer, suggesting they may release more harmful substances as they break down.
Do Biodegradable Microplastics Threaten Chlorella spp.? First Study in Indonesia Using Leachate Exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
This study investigated whether chemical leachates from biodegradable microplastics are toxic to Chlorella algae in Indonesian waters. The findings showed that even so-called biodegradable plastics release substances that can impair the growth of these foundational aquatic organisms. This raises questions about whether biodegradable plastics are truly safe alternatives, since their breakdown products can still harm the aquatic ecosystems that support fisheries and food production.
Acute Toxicity Effects of Aged Polyethylene and Polylactic Acid Microplastics on Microcystis aeruginosa: Growth and Oxidative Stress Response
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the acute toxicity of aged polyethylene (conventional plastic) and polylactic acid (biodegradable plastic) microplastics on the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Aged PLA microplastics inhibited algal growth more than aged PE, and UV-aged particles were more toxic than heat-aged ones for both plastic types. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics may not be less harmful than conventional plastics once they begin degrading in the environment.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.