0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Chitosan vs. Synthetic Polymers in Wastewater Treatment: Expanding the Plastic Pollution Dialogue through a Comparative Study on Performance, Environmental Impact, and Circular Economy

2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Maria Amorín

Summary

This review broadens the plastic pollution discussion to include water-soluble synthetic polymers used as flocculants in wastewater treatment—a category rarely considered in microplastic debates. The authors compare chitosan with synthetic polymer flocculants and find that non-solid polymers can cause toxicity and ecological disruption once discharged, warranting greater regulatory attention.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Discussions on plastic pollution have predominantly focused on solid and water-insoluble polymers, such as polyethylene and polystyrene, spanning from large debris to microplastics. However, there is another category that has been largely overlooked: non-solid polymers used as flocculants.Synthetic polymers used as flocculants in wastewater treatment can harm marine ecosystems in several ways: toxicity and bioaccumulation, disruption of natural aggregation processes and alteration of water quality posing a multi-faceted threat to marine ecosystems.In recent years, there has been a growing interest in sustainable alternatives for wastewater treatment, particularly in reducing reliance on synthetic polymers as flocculants. Synthetic polymers’ environmental and potentially toxic residuals underscore the urgent need for biodegradable and eco-friendly alternatives. Chitosan, a biopolymer derived from shrimp shell waste, has shown potential as an effective natural flocculant.This study evaluates chitosan’s flocculation performance compared to synthetic polymers through a series of jar tests to determine optimal dosing, turbidity reduction, and solid-liquid separation efficiency. In this study, real wastewater samples were used to evaluate chitosan’s effectiveness as a natural flocculant, ensuring practical relevance and enhancing the validity of the results. By using actual wastewater rather than simulated solutions, the research assessed chitosan’s performance under real-world conditions, which often include complex mixtures of organic and inorganic pollutants. This approach allowed for a more accurate comparison between chitosan and synthetic polymers, providing insights into chitosan’s practical feasibility and efficacy in diverse wastewater treatment scenarios. These findings suggest that chitosan is not only effective in reducing water turbidity but also supports efficient sludge management with lower moisture in the resulting dry cake.Chitosan has demonstrated comparable efficacy to synthetic polymers in flocculation processes for wastewater treatment demonstrating chitosan's effectiveness as a feasible replacement.Chitosan, repurposed from shrimp shell waste, embodies a circular economy approach by diverting biowaste from disposal and contributing to sustainable wastewater treatment.As the world focuses primarily on solid plastic pollutants in oceans, this work aims to expand this dialogue to include other forms of synthetic polymers. This transition towards bio-based flocculants aligns with global sustainability goals and supports ocean health, as treated wastewater and synthetic polymers (flocculants) residues often ultimately enter marine ecosystems. By adopting chitosan, wastewater treatment facilities can reduce their reliance on non-renewable resources, mitigate pollution, and contribute to healthier aquatic ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Biopolymer-based flocculants: a review of recent technologies

Researchers reviewed recent advances in biopolymer-based flocculants — water treatment agents derived from chitosan, starch, cellulose, and lignin — summarizing modification strategies and flocculation mechanisms, and highlighting their potential as environmentally friendly replacements for synthetic polymer flocculants that contribute to microplastic pollution in treated water.

Article Tier 2

Synthetic and biopolymers for lake restoration – An evaluation of flocculation mechanism and dewatering performance

Researchers compared synthetic polymer flocculants — chemicals added to water to make particles clump together so they can be removed — with biodegradable alternatives made from starch and chitosan for cleaning up nutrient-rich lake sediment. Biopolymers performed comparably for dewatering and left less phosphorus in the wastewater, making them a more environmentally friendly option that avoids adding non-degradable synthetic residues to ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Interaction of chitosan with nanoplastic in water: The effect of environmental conditions, particle properties, and potential for in situ remediation

Researchers tested chitosan — a natural polymer derived from shellfish — as a tool to aggregate and remove nanoplastic particles from water, finding it caused clumping at low doses but that high pH, dissolved organic matter, and surface chemistry of the plastics all affected its performance. The results suggest chitosan-based treatment has real potential for water remediation but requires careful tuning of environmental conditions.

Article Tier 2

Synergistic removal of microplastic fibres: Integrating Chitosan coagulation in hybrid water pre-treatment systems

Microplastic fibers are the most common type of microplastic found entering water treatment plants, yet their elongated shape makes them especially hard to remove with conventional filters. This study investigated using chitosan — a natural, biodegradable material derived from crustacean shells — as a "green" coagulant to clump fibers together so they can be more easily removed, and also developed chemically modified versions of chitosan that work across a wider range of water conditions. The results showed that combining chitosan-based coagulation with microbubble aeration creates a synergistic pretreatment system that significantly improves microplastic fiber removal while avoiding the residual metal ions left by conventional chemical coagulants.

Article Tier 2

Optimisation of Chitosan as A Natural Flocculant for Microplastic Remediation

Laboratory tests found that chitosan — a natural, biodegradable material derived from shellfish — can remove 68.3% of microplastics from water using a coagulation-flocculation process, with an optimal concentration of 30 ppm. Higher chitosan doses increased organic matter in the water (COD and BOD), suggesting a trade-off between microplastic removal efficiency and water quality parameters. Chitosan offers a promising eco-friendly alternative to synthetic chemicals for treating microplastic-contaminated water.

Share this paper