0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Kinetics and Pathways of Urea Release from Granules Spray-Coated with Biodegradable PHBV/PBAT Blends

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers coated urea fertiliser granules with two biodegradable plastics, PHBV and PBAT, and blends of both, to test how quickly nutrients released. PHBV-coated granules released nearly all urea within 24 hours, while PBAT-coated granules released slowly over 168 hours; imaging showed PHBV formed a porous coating and PBAT formed a smoother, more adhesive one.

Body Systems

Abstract Synthetic fertilisers play a crucial role in agricultural productivity and global food security, with nitrogen-based fertilisers, particularly urea, being the most widely used. However, the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of urea is only ~ 50%, leading to substantial nitrogen losses to the environment, resulting in significant environmental, health, and economic impacts. To mitigate these issues, enhanced efficiency fertilisers (EEFs) have been developed, including polymer-coated controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs). However, conventional polymer coatings are nondegradable, raising concerns about microplastic pollution. In this study, solutions of biodegradable poly(butylene adipate- co -terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate- co -3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and their blends (containing 25, 50, and 75 wt% PHBV) were spray coated onto urea granules using a lab-scale fluidised bed to form coatings with thicknesses ranging from 36 to 60 μm. Contrary to expectation, PHBV-coated granules released 94 ± 4% of urea within 24 h, whereas PBAT-coated granules released only 8 ± 3% urea over the same period, with approximately 93 ± 8% released over a 168-hour period, indicating a substantially longer release duration compared to the PHBV coating. The blend formulations exhibited intermediate release behaviour between the pure PHBV and PBAT coatings, with nutrient release generally increasing as the PHBV content increased. High-resolution micro-computed tomography showed that PHBV formed a porous, uneven coating with poor adhesion to the urea surface, while PBAT produced a smooth, uniform coating with better adhesion. Increasing the PHBV content in the blends led to higher coating porosity. These findings highlight both the potential and challenges of using PHBV and PBAT biodegradable coatings for controlled-release fertilisers.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effect of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)-coated urea on nitrogen release, greenhouse gas emissions, and residual behavior in soil

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested a plant-based plastic coating (PBAT) on urea fertilizer in soil, comparing it to regular urea and plastic (PE) coated urea. In lab incubations, PBAT-coated urea released nitrogen more slowly and produced fewer greenhouse gas emissions than regular urea, and no breakdown chemical from the coating was detected after seven months.

Article Tier 2

Long-term localization experiments reveal aging degradation mechanisms of biobased and petroleum-based polyurethanes in natural environments: degradation characteristics, product assessment and degradation cycle prediction

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a 807-day field localisation experiment to study the degradation mechanisms of biobased and petroleum-based polyurethanes used as polymer coatings on controlled-release fertilisers in natural soil environments. The study characterised the degradation products, assessed environmental risk, and developed a predictive model for the degradation cycle, finding that both polyurethane types fragment into microplastic residues at different rates.

Article Tier 2

Tracing Microplastics from Polymer-Coated Urea: Urban to Agricultural Pathways and Environmental Fate

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated off-site transport of microplastics from polymer-coated slow-release urea fertilizer across urban and agricultural settings, finding that surface application in agricultural fields released 39.3 g/ha of visible MPs per runoff event, while subsurface banding and incorporation reduced losses by 90% or more — making application method the key factor in limiting fertilizer-derived plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Fully bio-based polyurethane coating for environmentally friendly controlled release fertilizer: Construction, degradation mechanism and effect on plant growth

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a fully bio-based polyurethane coating for controlled-release fertilizers using castor oil and a plant-derived chemical. Unlike conventional polyurethane coatings that persist in soil as microplastics, this coating showed strong biodegradability while still effectively controlling nutrient release. The study offers a practical solution to reduce microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils from fertilizer coatings.

Article Tier 2

Environmental sustainability of future fertilizers: tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching for 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers under greenhouse conditions, finding that polymer-coated and inhibitor-based products showed significant performance tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. Six fertilizers performed well overall, and the study found that even fertilizers within the same class performed differently depending on the substrate used. The research highlights that polymer coatings on fertilizers, including biodegradable plastics, are a potential environmental source of microplastics.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper