0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Effect of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)-coated urea on nitrogen release, greenhouse gas emissions, and residual behavior in soil

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested a plant-based plastic coating (PBAT) on urea fertilizer in soil, comparing it to regular urea and plastic (PE) coated urea. In lab incubations, PBAT-coated urea released nitrogen more slowly and produced fewer greenhouse gas emissions than regular urea, and no breakdown chemical from the coating was detected after seven months.

Polymers
Body Systems

Urea, a widely used nitrogen fertilizer, rapidly releases nitrogen into a soil, reducing nitrogen use efficiency and causing environmental issues such as greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen leaching. To address these issues, controlled-release fertilizers such as polyethylene (PE)-coated urea have been developed to regulate nitrogen release kinetics. However, PE coating remains in soil and contributes to microplastic contamination. Therefore, this study evaluates the viability of polybutylene adipate- co -terephthalate (PBAT)-coated urea as a controlled-release fertilizer. The nitrogen [ammonium (NH 4 + -N) and nitrate (NO 3 - -N)] releases, greenhouse gas (CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O) emissions, and residual behavior of PBAT-coated urea (PBAT urea) in soil were compared with those of conventional urea (Urea) and PE-coated urea (PE urea) under aerobic (upland) and anaerobic (paddy) conditions. PBAT urea and PE urea delayed nitrogen release compared with conventional urea and continuously supplied nitrogen to the soil. In addition, both coated urea reduced greenhouse gas emissions compared with conventional urea. In particular, under aerobic conditions, cumulative nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions in the coated urea treatments decreased by 51.5–67.9% compared with conventional urea. After 7 months of incubation, terephthalic acid (TPA), a potential degradation product of PBAT, was not detected by LC-MS/MS analysis indicating that TPA did not accumulate to detectable levels under the incubation conditions of this study. Although PBAT-coated urea delayed nitrogen releases and reduced greenhouse gas emissions compared with conventional urea, long-term evaluation and additional verification under actual agricultural field conditions are required to assess the residual behavior and degradation of PBAT in soil.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Kinetics and Pathways of Urea Release from Granules Spray-Coated with Biodegradable PHBV/PBAT Blends

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers coated urea fertiliser granules with two biodegradable plastics, PHBV and PBAT, and blends of both, to test how quickly nutrients released. PHBV-coated granules released nearly all urea within 24 hours, while PBAT-coated granules released slowly over 168 hours; imaging showed PHBV formed a porous coating and PBAT formed a smoother, more adhesive one.

Article Tier 2

Fully bio-based polyurethane coating for environmentally friendly controlled release fertilizer: Construction, degradation mechanism and effect on plant growth

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a fully bio-based polyurethane coating for controlled-release fertilizers using castor oil and a plant-derived chemical. Unlike conventional polyurethane coatings that persist in soil as microplastics, this coating showed strong biodegradability while still effectively controlling nutrient release. The study offers a practical solution to reduce microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils from fertilizer coatings.

Article Tier 2

Bio-based polyurethane as a sustainable coating material for controlled-release fertilizer

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a bio-based polyurethane coating from palm kernel oil to create controlled-release fertilizer as an alternative to petroleum-based coatings. They found that adjusting the coating thickness and composition could effectively regulate how quickly nutrients are released to plants. The study offers a more sustainable approach to agricultural fertilizer delivery that reduces both environmental pollution and dependence on fossil fuel-derived materials.

Article Tier 2

Environmental sustainability of future fertilizers: tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching for 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers stress-tested 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers under controlled greenhouse conditions to compare their performance in reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. They found strong performance tradeoffs among products, with six fertilizers performing well across both measures, including polymer-coated formulations. The study notes that polymer coatings used in fertilizer technology, including biodegradable options like PLA, represent a potential source of microplastic contamination in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Environmental sustainability of future fertilizers: tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching for 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers stress-tested 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers under greenhouse conditions and found significant performance tradeoffs between reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. Six fertilizers performed well across both measures, including two inhibitor-based products and four polymer-coated formulations. The study notes that polymer coatings on fertilizers, including those made from biodegradable plastics like PLA, can themselves become sources of microplastics in agricultural soils.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper