We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Environmental sustainability of future fertilizers: tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching for 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers
Summary
Researchers evaluated 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers under greenhouse conditions, finding that polymer-coated and inhibitor-based products showed significant performance tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. Six fertilizers performed well overall, and the study found that even fertilizers within the same class performed differently depending on the substrate used. The research highlights that polymer coatings on fertilizers, including biodegradable plastics, are a potential environmental source of microplastics.
Nitrogen (N) fertilizers are critical to modern society and human well-being. However, these benefits have tradeoffs, as N fertilizer in excess of plant demand can lead to environmental impacts. New fertilizer technologies reduce losses to the environment, but many studies evaluate few technologies, and most field studies are difficult to cross-compare due to site and/or environmental effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate several enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) under common greenhouse conditions to isolate the effect of the EEF from the environmental effects in the field. Here we “stress tested” 11 EEFs under greenhouse conditions using two different soil types (clay loam from Iowa, USA, sandy loam from Minnesota, USA) for performance in two key areas – NH3 volatilization and N leaching. Our study included three nitrification inhibitors (DMPSA, Pronitridine, Nitrapyrin), one urease inhibitor (NBPT), two dual inhibitors (DCD+NBPT+Urea, DCD+NBPT+UAN), five polymer coated fertilizers, and two conventional fertilizers (UAN and urea). We found strong performance tradeoffs among EEFs. Considering both tests, there were six EEFs that performed well: two inhibitors (DMPSA, DCD+NBPT+Urea), and four polymer coated fertilizers (all three polyurethane-coated and the PLA/PBS-coated fertilizers). We also found the same class of EEF (e.g. nitrification inhibitor) could perform very differently based on substrate (e.g. Urea vs. UAN). Given that the polymer coated fertilizers all likely biodegrade very slowly (years) under field conditions and could accumulate microplastics in the environment, the two inhibitor-class EEFs (DMPSA, DCD+NBPT+Urea) may be promising candidates for additional field tests until more biodegradable polymers are developed.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Environmental sustainability of future fertilizers: tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching for 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers
Researchers stress-tested 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers under greenhouse conditions and found significant performance tradeoffs between reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. Six fertilizers performed well across both measures, including two inhibitor-based products and four polymer-coated formulations. The study notes that polymer coatings on fertilizers, including those made from biodegradable plastics like PLA, can themselves become sources of microplastics in agricultural soils.
Environmental sustainability of future fertilizers: tradeoffs between ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching for 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers
Researchers stress-tested 11 enhanced efficiency fertilizers under controlled greenhouse conditions to compare their performance in reducing ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. They found strong performance tradeoffs among products, with six fertilizers performing well across both measures, including polymer-coated formulations. The study notes that polymer coatings used in fertilizer technology, including biodegradable options like PLA, represent a potential source of microplastic contamination in agricultural soils.
Generation Characteristics of Micro Plastics from Different Types of Coated Controlled-Release Fertilizer Films
Researchers conducted soil incubation experiments simulating five years of continuous application of three polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers to characterize microplastic generation from their degrading coating films. The study found that the polymer coating type significantly affected both fertilizer release characteristics and microplastic production, with changes in soil nitrogen fractions and electrical conductivity influencing the rate of membrane shell degradation and subsequent plastic particle release.
Evaluating novel biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers for nitrogen‐efficient agriculture
Researchers designed and evaluated biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers for nitrogen-efficient agriculture, testing their performance in simulated tropical conditions and finding improved nitrogen retention compared to conventional fertilizers, though with some trade-offs in release kinetics.
Biodegradation of microplastics derived from controlled release fertilizer coating: Selective microbial colonization and metabolism in plastisphere
Scientists studied how microplastics from fertilizer coatings break down in soil over more than two years, finding that polyethylene degraded the most (nearly 17% weight loss) while producing secondary microplastic fragments and chemical byproducts. Specific bacteria and fungi colonized the plastic surfaces, forming biofilms that helped break down the material. This research shows that coated fertilizers are a direct source of microplastic pollution in farmland, where the breakdown products could enter crops and groundwater.