0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Rethinking material use in low-trophic aquaculture: A global review

Journal of Environmental Management 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Enrique De Paz

Summary

This systematic review reveals that low-trophic aquaculture — farming seaweed and shellfish often promoted as sustainable — actually relies heavily on plastic materials like ropes, nets, and floats. These plastics degrade in seawater and release microplastics directly into marine environments. The findings challenge assumptions about the environmental friendliness of these farming practices.

Study Type Review

Low-trophic aquaculture (LTA), including seaweed and bivalve farming, is often promoted as an environmentally sustainable food production system due to its low input requirements and potential ecological benefits. However, this sustainability narrative is increasingly undermined by the pervasive use of plastic-based gear. This systematic review of 1,768 peer-reviewed publications (2003-2024) reveals that synthetic polymers remain the dominant material in LTA infrastructure, contributing to marine litter, microplastic pollution, and long-term ecological degradation. Although one-third of studies mentioned farming gear, only 6 % (n = 108) disclosed the material composition, indicating a critical gap in sustainability reporting. Among these, over 70 % referenced conventional plastics such as polyethylene, polypropylene, and nylon. Regional and species-level differences emerged: natural materials were more frequently reported in Asian seaweed farming, whereas non-Asian studies were more likely to explore biodegradable or bio-based alternatives. Nevertheless, plastics remained prevalent across all contexts, particularly in bivalve systems (up to 88.2 % in Asia). Sentiment analysis of abstracts revealed regional differences in research framing, with Asian studies adopting a more pragmatic tone and non-Asian studies engaging more critically with environmental issues. These findings underscore the urgent need to address plastic dependence in LTA and promote scalable, regionally tailored alternatives through improved policy, reporting, and innovation pathways.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Developing the Use of Wool Rope within Aquaculture—A Systematic Review

This systematic review explores whether wool rope could replace plastic rope in seaweed aquaculture, reducing plastic pollution in marine environments. The research is directly relevant to microplastic concerns because conventional plastic ropes used in ocean farming gradually break down into microplastic particles that contaminate marine ecosystems and the seafood we eat.

Article Tier 2

Risk of aquaculture-derived microplastics in aquaculture areas: An overlooked issue or a non-issue?

This review examines aquaculture-derived microplastics from degrading fishing nets and foam buoys, finding they represent a significant but overlooked source of marine microplastic pollution with distinct environmental consequences compared to other sources.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and their potential effects on the aquaculture systems: a critical review

This review examines the sources, distribution, and potential ecological effects of microplastics in aquaculture systems worldwide. Researchers found that microplastics enter aquaculture through feed, water intake, and atmospheric deposition, and can accumulate in farmed fish and shellfish tissues. The study highlights the need for monitoring programs and mitigation strategies to protect both aquaculture productivity and consumer safety from microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Evaluating Pollution from Aquaculture Materials and Developing Sustainable Alternatives to Reduce Marine Environmental Impacts: A Case Study in Vietnam

Researchers assessed the status of marine pollution associated with aquaculture activities in Vietnam, with particular emphasis on plastic and microplastic contamination from aquaculture materials, and developed recommendations for more sustainable alternatives to reduce the environmental footprint of coastal aquaculture operations.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and ecological impact of microplastics in aquaculture ecosystems

This review examines microplastic contamination specifically within aquaculture systems, which are an increasingly important source of protein for human diets worldwide. Researchers found that aquaculture environments accumulate microplastics from external sources like land-based waste and shipping, as well as from the plastic gear, equipment, and feed used in farming operations. The study raises concerns about food safety, as microplastics in farmed seafood represent a direct pathway of human exposure.

Share this paper