0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Developing the Use of Wool Rope within Aquaculture—A Systematic Review

Sustainability 2022 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katherine Elizabeth Drury, Felicity Crotty

Summary

This systematic review explores whether wool rope could replace plastic rope in seaweed aquaculture, reducing plastic pollution in marine environments. The research is directly relevant to microplastic concerns because conventional plastic ropes used in ocean farming gradually break down into microplastic particles that contaminate marine ecosystems and the seafood we eat.

Polymers
Study Type Review

To date, wool is an underutilised sustainable resource that has the potential to reduce the use of plastic within the environment. Wool can be manufactured as rope, but is this a viable innovation? To gain a comprehensive understanding of the economic viability of utilising wool rope in seaweed aquaculture, a systematic literature review was undertaken. The review focuses on wool, rope, natural and man-made fibres and seaweed farming, and used bibliometric and content analysis of peer-reviewed papers, with no timeframe requirements. It is important to explore alternative materials to reduce marine rope pollution; ghost gear, microplastics from abrasion and plasticrusts are now believed to be significant ecological problems. To date, the production of wool rope is limited, and its strength and durability within the fishing industry remain untested. It is important to understand whether wool rope is a useful alternative: does it have the same tensile strength, and can it be used within the industry without the risk of damage to the environment? There is currently a lack of research on natural rope fibres, resulting in limited access to commercial rope alternatives being used within the industry. This systematic review shows that there has been a large gap in wool research, with limited publications in recent years; however, the drive to increase sustainability (particularly within the marine environment) has increased. This is the first paper that combines both topics within one research study. Further research is needed to identify whether wool rope will provide a feasible alternative to polypropylene in terms of strength and durability, and how wool rope will perform, the length of time it can provide optimum service and within which seaweed farming practice it can offer a practical alternative to polypropylene.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Circular and lower impact mussel and seaweed aquaculture by a shift towards bio‐based ropes

This review examines how shifting mussel and seaweed aquaculture from conventional plastic ropes to bio-based alternatives could reduce marine litter and microplastic generation. Bio-based ropes offer comparable functionality while providing better end-of-life options, including recycling and biodegradation. The transition would support circular economy principles and help reduce the aquaculture industry's contribution to ocean plastic pollution.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Food packaging based on biodegradable polymers from seaweeds: a systematic review

This systematic review examines the use of seaweed-based biodegradable polymers as alternatives to conventional plastic food packaging. The research explores how seaweed materials can provide effective food packaging while breaking down naturally in the environment. Replacing petroleum-based plastics with biodegradable alternatives is one strategy for reducing the microplastic pollution that enters our food and water.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Rethinking material use in low-trophic aquaculture: A global review

This systematic review reveals that low-trophic aquaculture — farming seaweed and shellfish often promoted as sustainable — actually relies heavily on plastic materials like ropes, nets, and floats. These plastics degrade in seawater and release microplastics directly into marine environments. The findings challenge assumptions about the environmental friendliness of these farming practices.

Article Tier 2

Challenge in increasing the use of animal-origin textile fibers to reduce microplastic pollution on earth

This review argues that replacing synthetic textile fibers with natural animal-origin fibers—such as wool and silk—could significantly reduce the release of microplastic fibers during washing, which currently contributes large quantities of plastic pollution to aquatic environments. The authors propose a scientific and policy framework to scale up natural-fiber use as a practical strategy for cutting textile-derived microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Exploring Seaweed Cultivation in the Marine Environment and Its Interaction with Microplastic

This review examines interactions between seaweed cultivation in marine environments and microplastic pollution, exploring how seaweed can both accumulate microplastics and potentially be used in bioremediation strategies to reduce plastic contamination in coastal waters.

Share this paper