0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Effectiveness of Microplastic Removal from River Water Using Conventional and Ultrafiltration Techniques: Correlation with Physicochemical Parameters

International Journal of Engineering 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nasrul Arahman, Farooq Anwar, Muhammad Prayogie Aulia, Cut Meurah Rosnelly, Ichwana Ramli

Summary

This study compared conventional and ultrafiltration water treatment methods for removing microplastics from river water in Indonesia, finding that ultrafiltration achieved significantly higher MP removal efficiencies, suggesting it as a more effective option for addressing MP contamination in drinking water.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MP) contamination in freshwater sources significantly threatens water quality and public health. The Krueng Aceh River, a vital water source in Aceh Province, Indonesia, is increasingly polluted by MP, necessitating effective treatment solutions. This study compares the efficiency of conventional water treatment methods (coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration) in MP removal with nanofiber membrane filtration. To identify the MP types, water samples from the six treatment stages were analyzed using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and optical microscopy. At the same time, statistical and computational analyses examined the correlations between MP and physicochemical parameters. Conventional treatment removed only 9%–31% of the MP, with polystyrene (PS) and polypropylene (PP) persisting in the treated water. In contrast, the nanofiber membranes achieved significantly higher removal rates, with Membrane-1 and Membrane-2 rejecting 93.65% and 90.48% of MP, respectively. The membrane filtration also improved the removal of turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), and nitrate. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) identified turbidity, TSS, TDS, flow velocity, and sampling time lag as the key factors influencing the MP concentrations. These findings highlight the limitations of conventional treatment and the potential of nanofiber membranes as a superior alternative. Integrating membrane filtration with advanced coagulation, adsorption, or oxidation processes is recommended to ensure safe drinking water. Future research should focus on membrane optimization and hybrid treatment strategies to enhance the MP removal efficiency.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Removal in Krueng Aceh River Water Using Ultrafiltration Membrane from Polyethersulfone Polymer (PES)

This study tested polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for removing microplastics from river water used as a drinking water source in Indonesia. The membranes showed effective removal, suggesting that membrane filtration is a viable treatment approach for microplastic-contaminated water supplies.

Article Tier 2

An assessment of the impact of structure and type of microplastics on ultrafiltration technology for microplastic remediation

Researchers assessed ultrafiltration technology for microplastic removal from water, finding that membrane performance varied based on microplastic structure, size, and polymer type, with implications for optimizing tertiary treatment in water purification systems.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

Researchers evaluated the performance of both advanced and conventional drinking water treatment processes for removing microplastics, finding that advanced methods such as ultrafiltration substantially outperform standard coagulation and filtration. Most conventional treatment plants leave a meaningful fraction of microplastics in finished drinking water.

Article Tier 2

Unraveling microplastics removal in wastewater treatment plant: A comparative study of two wastewater treatment plants in Thailand

Researchers compared microplastic removal efficiency at two wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok, finding that a facility equipped with ultrafiltration as a final polishing step achieved substantially higher microplastic removal than conventional treatment alone.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

Researchers assessed microplastic occurrence and removal efficiency at drinking water treatment plants using both conventional and advanced treatment processes. Advanced treatment steps such as ultrafiltration and activated carbon significantly improved microplastic removal compared to conventional coagulation and filtration alone.

Share this paper