0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the performance of both advanced and conventional drinking water treatment processes for removing microplastics, finding that advanced methods such as ultrafiltration substantially outperform standard coagulation and filtration. Most conventional treatment plants leave a meaningful fraction of microplastics in finished drinking water.

Models
Study Type Environmental

Potential health risks associated with microplastic ingestion via drinking water cannot be appropriately addressed until their occurrence and removal during treatment has been quantified. For most drinking water providers, monitoring of microplastics is not economically or practically feasible as it requires analytical expertise, lengthy sample processing, and costly instrumentation to quantify size, concentration, as well as to identify polymer types. These parameters must be appropriately determined such that potential human exposure and related health risks may be quantified. This study incorporated the use of in-line on-site sampling equipment such that small microplastics (¿2 µm) known to be associated with human health impacts could be readily captured. Following filtration of up to 50 L, background organic and inorganic material was removed via an optimized oxidation and enzymatic digestion method. Raman spectroscopy was subsequently employed for particle characterization. It is anticipated that the protocols developed during this study could easily be incorporated into standardized methods for the analysis of microplastics in drinking water. Results were used to compare the performance of a range of conventional treatment processes as well as technologies including ozone, UV, ultrafiltration, and advanced oxidation. Small microplastics (range 2-20 µm) were predominant in both raw and treated drinking waters. Both conventional and advanced treatment facilities were observed to typically remove ¿98 Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/566845/document

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed microplastic occurrence and removal efficiency at drinking water treatment plants using both conventional and advanced treatment processes. Advanced treatment steps such as ultrafiltration and activated carbon significantly improved microplastic removal compared to conventional coagulation and filtration alone.

Article Tier 2

Fate of microplastics in the drinking water production

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tracked the fate of microplastics through drinking water treatment processes, finding that conventional treatment steps like coagulation, sedimentation, and filtration removed the majority of microplastics but did not eliminate them entirely.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic removal across ten drinking water treatment facilities and distribution systems

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers characterized microplastic removal across ten drinking water treatment facilities and found that conventional municipal treatment achieved greater than 97.5% removal, primarily through granular media filtration or ultrafiltration. Untreated source waters contained between approximately 1,200 and 7,200 microplastic particles per liter, with polypropylene, polyethylene, and polyamide being the most common types. The findings provide valuable data on microplastic exposure through drinking water and the effectiveness of existing treatment processes.

Review Tier 2

Removal of microplastics and nanoplastics in water treatment processes: A systematic literature review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers systematically reviewed 103 studies across 26 water treatment plants in 12 countries to assess how well various technologies remove microplastics and nanoplastics from drinking water, finding that while coagulation, filtration, and advanced treatments help, significant gaps remain. The review identifies that no single process achieves complete removal, leaving microplastics as a persistent contaminant in treated water supplies.

Article Tier 2

Conventional and biological treatment for the removal of microplastics from drinking water

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined microplastic removal by a full-scale drinking water treatment plant, finding that conventional coagulation-flocculation-filtration processes and biological filters with granular activated carbon effectively reduced microplastic concentrations in treated water.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper