0
Article Tier 2 Remediation Sign in to save

Unraveling microplastics removal in wastewater treatment plant: A comparative study of two wastewater treatment plants in Thailand

Chemosphere 2022 36 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared microplastic removal efficiency at two wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok, finding that a facility equipped with ultrafiltration as a final polishing step achieved substantially higher microplastic removal than conventional treatment alone.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are considered as a problematic pathway for microplastics (MPs) entering the oceans. This study compares the efficiency of MP removal in two different WWTPs (A and A) with a conventional treatment system located in Bangkok, Thailand. WWTP-A is equipped with a pilot-scale ultrafiltration (UF) as a final polishing step. The number of MPs in the influent entering A and A was 16.55 ± 9.92 and 77.00 ± 7.21 MP/L, respectively. The average of 3.52 ± 1.43 and 10.67 ± 3.51 particles per L was found in the effluent discharged from A and A, respectively, to nearby canals. The removal efficiency of WWTP-A built as a closed underground system was shown to be up to 86.14% which is more efficient than the conventional WWTP (A). MPs were subsequently removed by a UF unit which resulted in a removal efficiency of 96.97%. However, when a large volume of treated wastewater volume is considered, a high concentration of MPs is discharged daily with the final effluent if the efficiency remains the same. The size fraction of 0.5-0.05 mm contributed to the largest proportion of MPs, and fibers were detected as the dominant group at both study sites. Results from a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) confirmed that most fibers were polyethylene terephthalate (PET) derived from clothes. MPs retained in the sludge ranged from 2.63 × 10 to 4.74 × 10 particles per kilogram of dry sludge. A significant number of MPs can spread further to the environment by soil application. The results of the study indicate that the design of WWTPs and the addition of advanced tertiary treatment can improve MP removal efficiency of a WWTP. Moreover, the absence of a primary sedimentation tank in both treatment plants may influence the removal efficiency.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effectiveness of conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants in microplastics removal: Insights from multiple analytical techniques

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants in removing microplastics across multiple treatment stages, finding removal efficiencies of 70–90% but documenting that billions of particles still pass through in final effluent daily.

Article Tier 2

An evaluation of microplastics fate in the wastewater treatment plants: frequency and removal of microplastics by microfiltration membrane

AI summary Read the abstract

This study assessed microplastic removal efficiency at a wastewater treatment plant in Iran and tested microfiltration membrane performance, finding that the membrane significantly improved microplastic removal beyond conventional treatment steps.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and Removal of Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Perspectives on Shape, Type, and Density

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compiled data from multiple countries on microplastic removal efficiency across different stages of wastewater treatment plants. They found that removal rates varied widely, from 48% in some facilities to over 90% in others, depending on the treatment technologies employed. The study suggests that while conventional wastewater treatment can capture a significant portion of microplastics, advanced tertiary treatment methods are needed to further reduce discharge into the environment.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the performance of both advanced and conventional drinking water treatment processes for removing microplastics, finding that advanced methods such as ultrafiltration substantially outperform standard coagulation and filtration. Most conventional treatment plants leave a meaningful fraction of microplastics in finished drinking water.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in wastewater and sludge from centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants: Effects of treatment systems and microplastic characteristics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared microplastic removal at centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok, Thailand. They found that centralized plants removed 50-97% of microplastics while smaller decentralized plants removed only 14-54%, with both types concentrating significant amounts of microplastics in their sludge, up to 228,100 particles per kilogram of dry weight.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper