We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Dual pathways of photosynthetic inhibition by nanoplastics: Light reaction blockade in soybean and carbon fixation enzyme suppression in corn
Summary
This study found that nanoplastics inhibit photosynthesis in plants through two distinct pathways—blocking light reactions and disrupting carbon fixation—with plants using different photosynthetic pathways (C3 vs. C4) showing varying degrees of vulnerability to nanoplastic exposure.
Nanoplastics (NPs) have raised increasing attention due to their potential environmental risks to terrestrial vegetation and food security. However, for the plants with various photosynthetic pathways, the differences in their photosynthetic response and related mechanisms upon NPs exposure are still unclear. Here, the photosynthetic responses of typical soybean and corn plants under polystyrene NPs (PSNPs) exposure were systematically compared for the first time. Our results revealed that the uptake of PSNPs by soybean and corn roots and was efficiently transferred to plant aerial portion through vascular bundle. The net photosynthetic rate of corn and soybean seedlings decreased 13.22 %-42.98 % and 17.28 %-48.19 % respectively, within different concentrations of PSNPs. For soybean plants, PSNPs hindered the photosynthesis in soybean by reducing the chlorophyll content, inhibiting the energy conversion efficiency of PSII and blocking electron transport in the light reaction. But for corn plants, the relative expression of carbon fixation enzyme genes (pepc, rbcL and rbcS) encoding phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) were down-regulated in corn exposed to PSNPs, and the activity of PEPC and Rubisco were significantly decreased by 21.54 %-30.77 % and 9.38 %-18.75 % respectively. The study highlighted PSNPs induce stronger soybean plants stress than corn plants responses from photosynthesis perspectives, which are valuable for evaluating the potential risks of NPs to food security of crops with different photosynthetic pathways.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Route-Specific Phytotoxicity: Foliar Polystyrene Nanoplastics Inhibit Rice Photosynthesis
Researchers compared root versus foliar exposure routes for polystyrene nanoplastics in rice plants and found that foliar exposure caused far more sustained damage to photosynthesis. The nanoplastics accumulated in leaves and co-localized with chloroplasts, leading to dramatic reductions in photosynthetic pigments, ATP production, and carbon fixation. The study suggests that airborne nanoplastic deposition on crop leaves may represent an underappreciated route of agricultural harm.
Micro and nanoplastics pollution: Sources, distribution, uptake in plants, toxicological effects, and innovative remediation strategies for environmental sustainability
This review examines how microplastics and nanoplastics enter plants through roots, disrupt growth and photosynthesis, and cause oxidative stress that reduces crop yields. Because these plastic particles can move through plant tissues and into edible parts, they represent a potential pathway for microplastics to enter the human food supply.
Negative impacts of nanoplastics on the purification function of submerged plants in constructed wetlands: Responses of oxidative stress and metabolic processes
Researchers exposed a submerged aquatic plant commonly used in constructed wetlands to polystyrene nanoplastics and measured the impacts on growth, photosynthesis, and metabolism. They found that nanoplastics were absorbed and transported throughout the plant, reducing growth by up to 73 percent and disrupting key metabolic pathways including the citric acid cycle. The study suggests that nanoplastic accumulation in wetland plants could compromise their ability to purify water.
Accumulation and Toxicity of Nanoplastics in Photosynthetic‐Species
This review examines how nanoplastics, plastic particles smaller than one micrometer, affect plants ranging from algae to crop species. Researchers found that nanoplastics can cross plant cell barriers and interfere with photosynthesis, growth, and gene expression. The study highlights that the small size of nanoplastics makes them particularly concerning because they can penetrate deeper into plant tissues than larger microplastics.
Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) on the physiology and molecular metabolism of corn (Zea mays L.) seedlings
Researchers exposed corn seedlings to polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes and measured effects on plant growth, photosynthesis, and molecular metabolism. They found that the nanoplastics accumulated in roots and disrupted antioxidant enzyme systems and metabolic pathways, though photosynthesis was relatively unaffected. The study suggests that nanoplastic contamination in agricultural soils could subtly impair crop development at the molecular level.