0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Detection of nanoplastics in food by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering: possibilities, challenges and analytical limitations

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2018 177 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested whether asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to light-scattering detection could identify nanoplastics in fish tissue, successfully detecting 100 nm polystyrene particles at a limit of 52 µg/g after enzymatic digestion, but found the method could not be directly transferred to polyethylene particles without further adjustment.

Polymers

We tested the suitability of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) coupled to multi-angle light scattering (MALS) for detection of nanoplastics in fish. A homogenized fish sample was spiked with 100 nm polystyrene nanoparticles (PSNPs) (1.3 mg/g fish). Two sample preparation strategies were tested: acid digestion and enzymatic digestion with proteinase K. Both procedures were found suitable for degradation of the organic matrix. However, acid digestion resulted in large PSNPs aggregates/agglomerates (> 1 μm). The presence of large particulates was not observed after enzymatic digestion, and consequently it was chosen as a sample preparation method. The results demonstrated that it was possible to use AF4 for separating the PSNPs from the digested fish and to determine their size by MALS. The PSNPs could be easily detected by following their light scattering (LS) signal with a limit of detection of 52 μg/g fish. The AF4-MALS method could also be exploited for another type of nanoplastics in solution, namely polyethylene (PE). However, it was not possible to detect the PE particles in fish, due to the presence of an elevated LS background. Our results demonstrate that an analytical method developed for a certain type of nanoplastics may not be directly applicable to other types of nanoplastics and may require further adjustment. This work describes for the first time the detection of nanoplastics in a food matrix by AF4-MALS. Despite the current limitations, this is a promising methodology for detecting nanoplastics in food and in experimental studies (e.g., toxicity tests, uptake studies). Graphical abstract Basic concept for the detection of nanoplastics in fish by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A protocol for size-based measurements of nanoplastics across the range 20 nm - 200 nm

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers validated a method combining asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering to size and quantify polystyrene nanoplastics in the 20–200 nanometre range. The study found that smaller nanoplastics are systematically underestimated by the technique and that separation conditions need optimisation for accurate measurement.

Article Tier 2

Finding the tiny plastic needle in the haystack: how field flow fractionation can help to analyze nanoplastics in food

AI summary Read the abstract

This review assessed field flow fractionation (FFF) as an analytical method for detecting and characterizing nanoplastics in food, noting that conventional techniques lack the resolution to identify nano-sized plastic particles in complex food matrices. FFF was identified as a promising tool for generating the exposure data needed for nanoplastic risk assessment.

Article Tier 2

Validated method for polystyrene nanoplastic separation in aqueous matrices by asymmetric-flow field flow fraction coupled to MALS and UV–Vis detectors

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed and fully validated a method to accurately measure nanoplastic particle sizes (30–490 nm) in water using a technique that combines flow separation with light-scattering detection. Having a validated analytical method is a critical step for standardizing how nanoplastics are measured across laboratories, enabling more consistent assessment of their environmental risks.

Article Tier 2

Detection and Identification of Non-Labeled Polystyrene Nanoplastics in Rodent Tissues Using Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (AF4) Combined with UV–Vis, Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) Detectors and Offline Pyrolysis–GCMS (Pyro-GCMS)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a multi-platform analytical method combining field-flow fractionation, light scattering, and pyrolysis-based mass spectrometry to detect and quantify non-labeled polystyrene nanoplastics in rodent tissues. They created tissue-specific digestion protocols for intestine, kidney, and liver that maximize particle recovery while preventing loss of submicron particles. The method provides a standardized approach for tracking nanoplastics in biological samples, which is essential for evaluating potential health risks.

Article Tier 2

An effective solution to simultaneously analyze size, mass and number concentration of polydisperse nanoplastics in a biological matrix: asymmetrical flow field fractionation coupled with a diode array detector and multiangle light scattering

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed an asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation method coupled with a diode array detector and multiangle light scattering to simultaneously measure the size, mass, and number concentration of polydisperse nanoplastics in biological matrices, providing a more accurate tool for assessing nanoplastic pollution levels.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper