0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

PROTOCOL: Plastics in the food system: Human health, economic and environmental impacts. A scoping review

Campbell Systematic Reviews 2019 25 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Joe Yates, Megan Deeney, Howard White, Edward J. M. Joy, Sofia Kalamatianou, Suneetha Kadiyala

Summary

This scoping review protocol outlines a plan to study how plastics in the food system affect human health, the economy, and the environment. Since mass plastic production began, over 8 billion metric tons have been created, and growing evidence suggests that plastics throughout the food supply chain may pose risks to human health through chemical exposure and microplastic contamination.

As of 2017, the running total of virgin plastics produced, since mass production of synthetic polymers began less than 70 years ago, was 8,300 million metric tons (Geyer, Jambeck, & Law, 2017); a fact that reflects the versatility of this remarkable group of materials which serve a vast range of important functions across various industries and sectors. However, there is growing evidence that the proliferation of plastic production and a reliance on these materials in the world economy, particularly in single-use or disposable forms, is leading to detrimental environmental and ecosystem impacts at local and global scales, with potentially negative implications for human health (Barboza, Dick Vethaak, Lavorante, Lundebye, & Guilhermino, 2018; UNEP, 2018). Packaging accounts for ~40% of all plastics produced since the 1950s, of which 41% is used specifically for food or beverages (Schweitzer et al., 2018). This statistic refers primarily to the latter stage of the food system in which food products are processed, marketed and transferred to consumers. However, plastics are also used extensively at other stages of the food system, for example in agricultural mulch, fishing nets and crates for transporting produce. Taken as a whole, the food system is likely to account for a much larger proportion of the world's reliance on plastics than its share in the use of plastic packaging alone. Within the food system, plastics play an important beneficial role in food transportation, preservation, hygiene and safety, increasing the lifespan of foods, the length of value chains and contributing to food and nutrition security (Claudio, 2012). Therefore, it is important that these beneficial functions are not overlooked in the public and policy debates concerning this material, its uses and impacts. However, recent decades have seen a correlation between substantial increases in plastic food packaging and upward trends in food waste (Schweitzer et al., 2018), suggesting that while plastic packaging can preserve food, in itself this might not be sufficient to reduce wastage. Recent calls to action on plastics are driven in part by observations that the widespread utilisation of single-use or disposable plastics, coupled with poor recycling rates and waste management is contributing to visible build ups of plastic across natural environments and oceans around the world. To illustrate this flow, of the total 6300 Mt of plastic waste produced by 2015, only 9% had been recycled or repurposed, with the remaining 91% either incinerated, placed into landfill or leaking into the natural environment (Geyer et al., 2017). The extent of the impacts of plastic pollution is still largely unknown and remains to be adequately explored. Among the evidence now beginning to emerge is that which reveals an increasing presence of microplastics, nanoplastics and synthetic polymers in marine food chains, food products and the air we breathe (Karami et al., 2017; Lusher, McHugh, & Thompson, 2013; Smith, Love, Rochman, & Neff, 2018; Tyree & Morrison, 2018). Not surprisingly, negative consequences for human and planetary health are also now being hypothesised and investigated (Barboza et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2018). These interlinking concerns around sustainability come in addition to toxicology research pointing towards potentially harmful effects that chemicals or additives used in plastics may pose for humans (Gray, Rasanayagam, Engel, & Rizzo, 2017; Rancière et al., 2015) as well as the suggestion that plastic packaging could be encouraging unhealthy diets (Relton, Strong, & Holdsworth, 2012). On a broader scale, it can be said that plastics are also linked to global warming and climate change, as around 99% of plastic monomers are derived from fossil fuels, the supply and demand for which contributes to greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). Yet in agricultural production, evidence also suggests that plastic sheeting can deliver environmental benefits such as reduced GHG emissions (Petersen et al., 2013). Taking such trade-offs into account, there are growing calls for improved data and evidence to better understand and address the various effects of plastics, whilst developing alternatives — where necessary — for the functions they serve (Efferth & Paul, 2017; The Lancet Planetary Health, 2017). A major challenge for research investigating the role and impacts of plastics is to establish causal links between specific sectoral or industry flows and the impacts — both beneficial and harmful — that they might be having on natural environments, human health and wellbeing. Without a better understanding of these linkages, underpinned by a comprehensive and robust scientific evidence base, attempts to preserve the benefits and mitigate the harmful effects of plastics will be hampered. For this reason, we will conduct a systematic scoping review, looking at the impacts of plastics that are used specifically in or across the food system. This will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews, which advises that scoping reviews 'may examine the extent (that is, size), range (variety), and nature (characteristics) of the evidence on a topic or question' (Tricco et al., 2018). To do this, we will explore the food system's constitutive sub-sectors — from 'farm to flush' — to examine the extent (volume of research), range (variety of exposure-outcome relationships) and nature (study characteristics) of evidence for the impact of food system plastics on human health, food security and economics at the individual or household level and the environment. We characterise the exposure as plastic, including chemicals specifically emanating from the plastic exposure that are essential to its fundamental structure or functionality (i.e., phthalate plasticisers, or chemicals such Bisphenol A) used at any point, for any purpose, explicitly within the food system. Categories of plastics are defined by the Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI) resin identification codes and will include: polyethylene terephthalate, high-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, low-density polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene or styrofoam, miscellaneous plastics (includes: polycarbonate, polylactide, acrylic, acrylonitrile butadiene, styrene, fibreglass and nylon) (Sustainable Packaging Coalition, 2017). In accordance with the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) we define the food system as 'the entire range of activities involved in the production, processing, marketing, consumption and disposal of goods that originate from agriculture, forestry or fisheries, including the inputs needed and the outputs generated at each of these steps' (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013). Plastic in the food system is found in many different forms. For example, in agriculture plastic is used for mulching, growing tunnels, greenhouses and irrigation systems. In fishing, plastics are used in nets, lines and traps. Food and produce processing, storage and distribution use plastic in the form of packing crates, wrapping and food contact equipment. Packaging forms a crucial part of sales, marketing and consumption of goods. In addition, plastic food shopping bags, plastic crockery and cooking equipment are widely available at the consumer level. Finally, at the end of the food system with food disposal and waste management, plastic is used in pipes, compost storage containers, or in the black plastic bags thrown into landfill. The durability of plastic means that its use within the food system may have both short and long term effects. For example, plastic mulch used in agriculture may increase crop yields in the short term, but when the plastic begins to break down in the soil, it may have an impact on plant growth or the soil microbiota for years to come (Steinmetz et al., 2016). Estimates of biodegradation times in marine environments for different plastics range from around 20 years for a plastic shopping bag, to 50 years for a styrofoam cup, to 450 years for a plastic and to years for plastic fishing lines & 2018). This means that the use of plastics within the food system may to have an on the human health and long In this the for these plastic and the impact that they also For the of this review, we use and human food security and the natural environment. the nature of this review, we the specific in the and in the and to For this reason, the major between and whilst also the necessary for defined to be by the for this systematic scoping on the impact of plastics used within the food system on human health, individual and household food security and and the natural environment can be at To the impact are as we that the are and 2013). We these in the of The the between the exposure in the food and the impact (i.e., plastics in the food system leading to an impact as well as that we as being on the to impact (i.e., plastics in the food system leading to impacts on a that to an impact The these that we to are in We that could a between any of the plastic used at any of the food system, and a impact on human this will have to human either a harmful or contributing to or or a beneficial or or of health and the of or or or The from exposure to human health this of human health impacts that have been in the on plastics are and from plastic & and impacts chemicals from the plastics on and for example & In to for scoping review, will have to that the plastic, including chemicals from the plastic, from a specific human use within the food system, which is not the also the role of plastic food packaging in the of human For example, (i.e., in Plastic packaging can to human health by food and for consumption (Claudio, a in with food system plastics be in the food to human by which the between plastics and human health exposure or of plastic or plastic additives et al., 2018; et al., In addition to the impacts on human health, we that will effects or with a impact on human health as in important as is food or may the presence of harmful and in or as a a food system plastic is in this on the food or we will the for effects on human we will also that the presence of plastic or additives in food or as an on the to human health food and human health, we will — the presence of plastic or additives within the human may not be to evidence of an the in this from food system plastics to we to crucial as to the range of human health impacts. of the specific each will to that the plastic exposure specifically within the food system. As a and of the impacts of plastics on food security and economics is on that do not to all or between and in this impact is individual and household level food and nutrition and including in food total and household food and food We that could a or with the use of plastics in the food system on these which could be of a beneficial or harmful nature to the of of food and nutrition security and household we are to a range of that will be in this These such as food food food food crop or produce growth and soil soil soil and or or plant health and other harmful or effects or We this range of as a in of but a of scoping is to the range of used in these and we will in of as we in these to the impact are in For example, plastic an important role in hygiene and of food, in both and storage of the food system (Claudio, 2012). plastic increases the hygiene and of food, with its to and its to be for in the or of plastic may increase food by increasing and increasing food in and increasing food and food utilisation — since can and preserve food These are as the of Food & and will be as in accordance with on the of food We also such as and in the the that at this level will have an on the of agricultural (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, to we that may not to looking at the impacts of plastic on household or and we these in to understanding of the potentially beneficial impacts of The health of the natural environment is can be in of climate change, health and ecosystem and natural We that could impacts of plastic used in the food system on any of these impact This is in the of The line of from exposure in the food to on the to the range of that can be used to the natural from exposure to will be example of the impacts of plastic is to marine and leading to and et al., 2017; Law, 2017). also been that the plastics used in the world are greenhouse and into the air when to This plastics on the and in the in but contributing to gas emissions and to climate & 2018). However, plastic used to in the agricultural have also been to reduce the of into the an (Petersen et al., 2013). We to any environmental that as a of food system As in we will also impacts on the such as the presence of plastic or additives in soil, air and and As essential of the natural any effects on soil, air or impacts on the environment in However, in these are placed as to in broader of the natural including and plant the of and We that may effects at this level being to links to ecosystem or global warming for example, we to in in to the range of environmental impacts. we to as an the presence of plastics or additives within as we this as a crucial on the from plastic exposure to or These will have to or a in exposure in to impacts than and research of the impacts of reliance on plastics the 20 years and from different of such as agricultural production, food materials environmental health and public health to increases in research and the of the the evidence for the impact of food system plastic is understanding of the of research across these specifically on the impact of plastics used within the food system, will for research that can to action and food system In the research have been for example the impacts of plastic marine on of plastic mulch on crop and of mulch on plant and of plastic packaging on et al., & 2018; & 2018; & 2018). These are a of the recent and with many it is essential that we build a and comprehensive of the research that been in to specific where there is a for systematic reviews or policy reviews that at the impacts of plastics in marine environments, on the soil ecosystem and on human health & 2018; Law, 2017; et al., 2018). These reviews are crucial for on the impacts of plastics within specific plastic is and from different industry In addition, these reviews are not conducted We to to this understanding by impacts to a specific of plastic food system and its in to increase we to the of impact to into account the human health, food security and and environmental impacts of not have impacts of specific uses of plastics in the food system, for example, a of agricultural plastic on soil (Steinmetz et al., 2016). These of reviews are in to understanding of the impacts of specific uses of plastics they are in both at the exposure and and can not address of the research on the impacts of plastics within the food system. The that reliance on plastic is having on and on health been a growing public in recent around the world are to reduce plastic across including the food and to disposal and recycling 2018). in the form of and on the production, and of bags have been the to such in in in and in 2018). A on plastic bags was in in 2017, with for and the of this remains 2017). a on plastic and for in the 2018). In to that are in or the use of plastics, and are robust in from the plastics a is 2018). scoping will to an for food system by a of evidence to the impacts — harmful and — of plastics used in the food system on human health, individual and household food security and economics and the environment. This scoping is by the is the range and nature of the evidence on the human health, individual and household food security and and environmental impacts of plastics used within the food system, including the extent to which research been the range of exposure-outcome and in this since there evidence or to the impacts of plastics in the food system and where is there a for research or to conduct systematic reviews within the of the human health, individual and household food security and and environmental impacts of plastics in the food The for scoping is by the Extension for Scoping Reviews (Tricco et al., and will examine the range and nature of the evidence for the impact of plastics used within the food system on human health, food security and economics at the individual or household and the environment. will be conducted in by and and by will be at and We an an with to each with example as to the of these and was and We of that by or by and on to each on to the in and will be by including for will be of and rates will be of at a a of is will be with by for data will be for and in the We will all and with a with or of or and and and in which the is a of or in which there is group or will be as will that do not a of or will be of the impact of plastics in the food system on human health may to human in any including and in conducted between will be will be This is to into account the nature and of food coupled with increases in plastic production and waste since (Geyer et al., 2017). on can be found in this will be looking at the impact of plastics used in the food system on food safety, and or will not a human the will of food or investigating plastics used within the food system and presence in the human may to human in any including and in The will be to of the impact of plastics in the food system on individual or household food security and economics may to human at the individual or household level in any including and in from to that food security or economics on a broader such as at industry or will be Food food food utilisation and food of the impact of plastics used in the food system on the of food security may to human at the individual or household level in any including and in from to that these at a broader such as at industry or will be soil soil soil and or or plant health and other harmful or effects or is that of the impact of plastics used in the food system on these may not to a human we that the will be the produce or soil to which these of the impact of plastics in the food system on the environment may to plant or or natural in environments, from to of plastics, additives or gas emissions in soil or the will be the soil, or air and as such refers to the natural environment in which and of plastics or additives may plant or in environments, from to The exposure is plastic used at any within the food system, as well as additives that are essential for its fundamental structure or functionality (i.e., phthalate plasticisers, or chemicals such Bisphenol In accordance with the we define the food system as 'the entire range of activities involved in the production, processing, marketing, consumption and disposal of goods that originate from agriculture, forestry or fisheries, including the inputs needed and the outputs generated at each of these steps' (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 2013). We will to the system any human For and and and and and and We will also that use food and to an or of food system plastics or or and will also be We will to the production and other human activities around forestry for and other produce. We will in which the of plastic is industries of the food system, for example in or for different forms of plastic is from resin identification codes and will include: polyethylene terephthalate, high-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, low-density polyethylene, polypropylene, acrylic, polycarbonate, and fibreglass (Sustainable Packaging Coalition, 2017). These plastic will the that refers only to or nanoplastics that be as specifically from use within the food system will be plastic plastic of the of plastic to plastic with in of of plastic exposure group or in with of scoping is to and the and trends of research on the impact of plastics used within the food system on human health, food security and impacts at the individual or household level and environmental impacts at any level. to and characterise the of specific impact that have been in recent for this we are not a the used within these or effects including or by plastic or plastic beneficial or effects including the of or or effects or may within the of including food and including increases or in of harmful of with plastic or chemicals additives and the presence of plastics or additives within the human food security and or to individual household food and nutrition security and harmful or effects or with household economics including in food total household food and food may within the of including food food food food soil soil soil and or or plant health and other harmful or effects or The natural harmful or effects or including to in greenhouse gas plant of ecosystem or sustainability of natural may within the of including the presence of plastics or additives in soil, air or and will be placed on the of of and which do not will be placed on the of may or environments, in any part of the world. Food system in the of the of and growth have driven fundamental in food system. These by the of that value chains are than around food production, processing, transportation, preservation, and Plastic a role in this recent (i.e., in food and its also in part a towards diets from We to the for each of these in the years from which these and policy environment As in the on of waste management, recycling and around disposable plastic are still in and have the 20 the growth in plastic and evidence of environmental the plastic was only in In to recycling at the consumer level in the which in substantial increases in recycling The environment around food also since the For example, the Food — which primarily but also around and — was only in in the Food was in Plastics supply and demand the of consumption and the production and use of plastics since In 50 of plastic produced in this was and in 2018). The of plastic use and its for beneficial and harmful impacts in is different from and scientific understanding The decades have seen not only the food system and recycling but also materials and alternatives to derived plastic this, there been an understanding of impact by and to these For example, there is now a understanding of than in the and by which to in food and humans in the of this means that data from this are for We will a of this in the of the The been with the of a and The will be in the and the will be used to for to and plastics polyethylene polystyrene styrofoam fibreglass soil marine of natural food 2015) of Systematic Reviews of will be conducted in will be for and of research Food Organisation Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations The The United Nations for Food and United for The and will be to for will be for in the of food plastics and the natural environment will be to any In we will with a range of and plastics at different the where necessary to the of and to any research these may have As a scoping review, this to the of that are being to the impact of plastic used in the food system on the scoping we a range of including and forms of As a scoping review, we to characterise the research than the of specific evidence or for data will be on a of leading to or This will for across with the necessary of to that we are to the range of impacts as they emerge from the A structure is which will be at the level as we the for data can be at As a scoping review, will be for the of evidence by exposure and and any other will not be conducted for this We do not to This will be conducted by at the of & the and a global of and at the of nutrition and this we will with sustainability of food systems. of & the and for Agriculture and by from the is of the for which there is an in increasing in the However, is not involved in the or the of this have other of Systematic

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

A scoping review protocol on in vivo human plastic exposure and health impacts

This scoping review protocol outlines a plan to systematically gather evidence on how plastics found inside the human body affect health. With global plastic production having generated over 6.3 billion metric tons of waste, humans are increasingly exposed to micro- and nanoplastics through food, water, and air. The review aims to map what is known — and what gaps remain — about the direct health consequences of plastic particles in human tissues.

Article Tier 2

A scoping review protocol on in vivo human plastic exposure and health impacts

Researchers registered a pre-planned protocol for a scoping review that will systematically map existing research on how humans are exposed to plastics in real life and what health effects have been observed in human studies. This type of pre-registration helps ensure transparent, rigorous scientific methods before the data collection begins.

Article Tier 2

Potential risk assessment and toxicological impacts of nano/micro-plastics on human health through food products

This review examined the potential risks and toxicological effects of nano- and microplastics on human health through food products, identifying key contamination sources in the food chain and their harmful impacts on the body.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in food: scoping review on health effects, occurrence, and human exposure

This review synthesizes evidence on microplastic occurrence in a broad range of food types beyond fish and shellfish, estimated human dietary exposure, and potential health effects including toxicity from particles themselves, leached monomers, chemical additives, and co-contaminants, identifying major research gaps in non-marine food categories.

Article Tier 2

Food Contamination by Microplastics and Human Health Implications

This review examines how food is contaminated by microplastics throughout the supply chain — from agricultural soil and irrigation water to food processing and packaging — and evaluates the health implications for human consumers. The authors estimate dietary microplastic intake across food categories and identify seafood, drinking water, and packaged foods as the highest-exposure routes.

Share this paper