0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Comparative analysis on the sorption kinetics and isotherms of fipronil on nondegradable and biodegradable microplastics

Environmental Pollution 2019 210 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Wenwen Gong Tingting Zhang, Wenwen Gong Wenwen Gong Mengyun Jiang, Wenwen Gong Wenwen Gong Tingting Zhang, Mengyun Jiang, Tingting Zhang, Guannan Liu, Tingting Zhang, Guannan Liu, Ping Han, Wenwen Gong Wenwen Gong Mengyun Jiang, Mengyun Jiang, Tingting Zhang, Gang Liang, Tingting Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Gang Liang, Mengyun Jiang, Tingting Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Gang Liang, Wenwen Gong Tingting Zhang, Wenwen Gong Tingting Zhang, Guannan Liu, Tingting Zhang, Gang Liang, Tingting Zhang, Wenwen Gong Tingting Zhang, Wenwen Gong Tingting Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Wenwen Gong Wenwen Gong Wenwen Gong Wenwen Gong

Summary

The sorption behavior of the pesticide fipronil onto biodegradable and conventional non-degradable microplastics was compared through both experiments and molecular dynamics simulations, finding differences in how strongly each plastic type binds the pesticide. Biodegradable plastics, often considered safer alternatives, may carry different pesticide contamination risks than conventional plastics when they fragment into microparticles.

Biodegradable plastics have been introduced and widely used as a promising alternative to traditional nondegradable plastics. However, the differences in sorption behavior of pesticides on nondegradable and biodegradable microplastics has been insufficiently studied. Here, four types of nondegradable [polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP)] and two types of biodegradable [polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene succinate (PBS)] microplastics were selected to investigate the sorption mechanism of fipronil based on their sorption kinetics and isotherms. The results indicated that the sorption rates of PLA and PBS were much higher than those of PE, PP, PVC and PS and that the sorption capacities of fipronil on microplastics followed the order of PBS > PLA > PP > PE > PS > PVC. The sorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order kinetics model (R = 0.953-0.998) for all tested microplastics. External mass transport and intraparticle diffusion were the main rate controlling steps of the sorption of fipronil on microplastics. Furthermore, isotherm results indicated that a Langmuir model provided the best fit for fipronil sorption on PE, PS, PVC and PP (R = 0.997-0.999), while a Freundlich model was the most appropriate model for PLA and PBS (R = 0.998-0.999). The presence of surface O-containing functional groups and the spatial arrangement of rubbery domains are likely to affect the sorption process. The results from this work suggest that microplastics, especially biodegradable ones, may play an important role in the fate and transport of pesticides, and their effects on soil organisms (e.g., earthworms) require further investigation.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper