We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics, PAHs and biofilms in freshwater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested how five common plastic types adsorb polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in freshwater and serve as surfaces for microbial biofilm growth. All five plastics were able to bind PAHs and support biofilms, suggesting microplastics can concentrate toxic compounds and harbor bacteria in freshwater environments.
Water pollution resulting from domestic and industrial use of non-biodegradable materials such as plastics is a major source of water pollution and concern. In the present work, we investigated the ability of five different plastics to adsorb PAHs in freshwater bodies and functioning as surfaces for biofilm assembly. The ability of five currently used plastics, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) to adsorb benzo-(a)-pyrene (BaP), a group 1 carcinogenic compound, pyrene (Pyr) a less toxic compound that we detected in different water samples in a previous study was evaluated by HPLC-FLD. The same method was used to assess the concentration of BaP and Pyr in solution. After 3 days BaP was preferentially adsorbed by all plastics being PP and PS the most and less efficient in PAH adsorption, respectively. Pyr adsorption followed the same trend but without significant differences. After 30 days, the differential adsorption of BaP and Pyr by different plastics vanished being the higher recovering rates observed for HDPE. In parallel, the ability of bacterial species isolated from freshwater responsible for infections in humans (E.coli, K. pneumoniae and Aeromonas sobria) to assemble biofilms on plastics was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and viable colony forming units (CFU) were evaluated by platting on selective media after 1 and 3 months. Biofilm assembly increased with time. LDPE followed by HDPE and PS were the best surface for biofilm assembly, curiously these plastics were the ones for which more surface irregularities were deteted at all time points (0, 1 and 3 months). For PET and PP biofilms and bacteria were detected only after 3 months in small plastic fragments. The presence of Pyr, BaP or mixture of Pyr:BaP (1:1) significantly inhibit planktonic bacteria proliferation. The effect of PAHs on biofilms differs with bacterial species and exposure time. The present results show that plastics can adsorb PAH present in water and function as surfaces for biofilm assembly by different human pathogens. The impact of PAH adsorbed in plastics on bacterial biofilm assembly is a work on progress, as well as, the toxicity effects on human cells.
More Papers Like This
Exploring the interplay between microplastics, polyciclic aromatic hidrocarbons and biofilms in freshwater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers explored how microplastics interact with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in freshwater, and how both pollutants together form biofilms. The study found that microplastics can act as concentration surfaces for PAHs, potentially amplifying toxic exposure in organisms that ingest plastic particles.
Exploring the Interaction between Microplastics, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Biofilms in Freshwater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated the adsorption of benzo(a)pyrene and pyrene by five microplastic types in freshwater over 3 and 30 days, finding that polypropylene was the most efficient adsorbent while polystyrene was the least efficient for benzo(a)pyrene. The study also examined how bacterial biofilms on microplastics, including pathogenic species such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, interact with PAH adsorption dynamics.
Close encounters on a micro scale: microplastic sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their potential effects on associated biofilm communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated the sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) onto microplastics and the potential cascading effects on biofilm communities associated with those microplastics in aquatic environments. They found that evaluating microplastics in isolation underestimates their ecological impact, as co-transported PAHs can alter the composition and function of biofilm communities across different compartments of aquatic ecosystems.
Evaluation of Polyciclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water and Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured five cancer-linked PAH compounds in water samples and found that microplastics can bind these chemicals, potentially concentrating them. This suggests microplastics may act as carriers of carcinogenic compounds in drinking water and aquatic environments.
Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by microplastic films: Characterizing kinetics, isotherms, and impacts of sludge exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
This study characterized the sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons onto microplastic films in sludge and wastewater systems, finding that MP type and surface properties strongly influence PAH binding capacity and may facilitate PAH transport and bioavailability in contaminated environments.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.