0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microbiome Of Ecotoxicity Assays

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) 2021 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Asa Motiei

Summary

This review examined how microorganisms in test systems affect the outcomes of ecotoxicology experiments, noting that bacteria can both increase and decrease the apparent toxicity of test substances including microplastics. Accounting for microbial interactions is important for accurately interpreting how microplastics harm aquatic and soil organisms in laboratory tests.

Microorganisms are ubiquitous and present in animal microbiomes, particulates, and colonizable surfaces of test systems. From an ecotoxicological perspective, they are metabolically active biological compartments that respond to test conditions, including test substances. In exposure experiments, microorganisms can both alleviate toxicity via, for example, biotransformation, and reinforce the adverse effects via, for example, disrupted microbiome-host interactions. Acknowledging these interactions is essential for a mechanistic understanding of results in effect studies and developing assays towards more ecologically relevant hazard assessment. Therefore, there is increasing attention toward “microbiome aware ecotoxicology” in recent years, focusing mostly on test organism microbiomes. I studied how microorganisms present in systems designed for acute and chronic toxicity assays with Daphnia magna affect the test outcome. The experimental studies showed that bacteria introduced in the system intentionally (as a part of the experimental design; Papers I, II, and III) or unintentionally (with the microbiome of the test animals; Paper IV) responded to the test substances and mediated the exposure for the target species. In these studies, we employed the emerging contaminants ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic drug; Paper I) and various fossil-based polymers (microplastic; Papers II, III, and IV), representing a microbiome disrupting and a biofilm promoting type of substance respectively. In Paper I, we hypothesized that exposure to antibiotics would primarily target the daphnid microbiome with downstream effects on the host fitness. To test this hypothesis, we chronically exposed daphnids to ciprofloxacin, which resulted in decreased microbiome diversity. However, contrary to our hypothesis, there were significant stimulatory effects on the host fitness and antioxidant production due to the direct pro-oxidative ciprofloxacin effects on the host. Although the microbiome was not directly involved in the growth-related responses to the ciprofloxacin exposure, the microbiome’s alterations suggest that exposure to any antimicrobials, which – unlike ciprofloxacin – do not stimulate antioxidant production, would result in gut dysbiosis with possible adverse effects on the host. Further, we hypothesized that in assays with particulate test materials, such as microplastic, bacterial biofilms increase particle aggregation, affecting exposure levels. This hypothesis was tested using D. magna exposed to a mixture of kaolin clay and polystyrene with and without biofilm (Paper II). We found that biofilm significantly decreased the adverse effects exerted by particulates directly, most likely, by providing nutrition for the daphnids, and indirectly, by inducing particle aggregation. In Paper III, we compared biofilm communities established on the plastic (polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene) vs. non-plastic (cellulose and glass) substrates. The biofilm communities on the plastic were significantly different from those on the non-plastic materials; hence, microplastic contribution to the suspended solids in the exposure can drive the biofilm community composition in the system. Finally, in Paper IV, we found that in a closed system designed to evaluate microplastic effects on D. magna, bacteria originated from the daphnid microbiome colonize particulates and affect their aggregation and animal survival. Together, these findings suggest that chemical exposure (Paper I), the microbiome of the test animal (Paper IV), the composition of the suspended solids (SS) (Papers II and IV), and their surface properties (Paper III) contribute to the diversity and abundance of the biofilm in the test system, which can affect the test outcome. Thus, the microbiome reacts to and interacts with contaminants within a test system, which calls for the appreciation of these interactions when interpreting the results as well as new developments toward standardization of the bacterial component in (eco)toxicity assays with eukaryotic test species.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Unlocking secrets of microbial ecotoxicology: recent achievements and future challenges

This review explores how microorganisms interact with environmental pollutants, including microplastics, covering how bacteria can break down pollutants but are also harmed by them. The authors highlight that microplastics create new surfaces in the environment where bacteria form communities, potentially spreading harmful species or antibiotic resistance. Understanding these microbial interactions is critical for developing nature-based solutions to reduce pollution and protect human health.

Article Tier 2

Microbiological perspectives on the effects of microplastics on the aquatic environment

This review examines how microplastics interact with microorganisms in aquatic environments, highlighting risks to microbial communities and the potential for microplastics to disrupt ecosystem functions. Microplastics may alter microbial diversity and promote the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Article Tier 2

Aggregation in experimental studies with microparticles: Bacterial communities in the exposure system affect animal responses to the test particles

Researchers found that bacterial communities established by the test animals themselves in exposure vessels significantly influenced how aquatic organisms responded to microplastic particles in laboratory studies. The findings highlight a frequently overlooked confounding factor in ecotoxicological experiments with particulate materials.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics and their interactions with microbiota

This review examines how microplastics interact with microbiota (the communities of microorganisms in the environment and in living bodies). Microplastics can carry harmful bacteria and disrupt the natural balance of microbial communities in soil, water, and the human gut. The disruption of gut microbiota by microplastics is particularly concerning because a healthy gut microbiome is essential for immune function, digestion, and overall health.

Article Tier 2

Quantification and Ecotoxicological Evolution of Microplastics in Soil Ecosystem

This review discusses methods for quantifying microplastics in soil and aquatic sediments and assesses their ecotoxicological effects on invertebrates, plants, and microbes, finding that MPs impair soil function and food web dynamics across concentration ranges commonly found in contaminated environments.

Share this paper