0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Developmental Effects of Microplastic Ingestion on the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes sigillatus

2021 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Serita Fudlosid

Summary

Researchers fed crickets diets containing different concentrations of polyethylene microbeads and polyester microfibers, finding that both types reduced body weight gain and development compared to controls. This is one of the few studies on microplastic effects on terrestrial insects, which are important for food webs, pollination, and nutrient cycling.

Polymers

Microplastic (MP) is now considered ubiquitous in our ecosystems. Microplastics have been confirmed to be present in terrestrial environments, yet the majority of studies have focused on the effects of MPs on aquatic biota. I tested the effect of microplastic exposure on the growth of the cricket Gryllodes sigillatus. Crickets were fed a diet containing different concentrations of fluorescent polyethylene MP beads (75-105μm) or untreated polyethylene terephthalate microfibers until adulthood. Weight and body length were measured weekly and MP ingestion was confirmed through fluorescence microscopy and inspection of frass. I found no effect of polyethylene MP ingestion on growth rate of G. sigillatus, yet females experienced a reduction in size and weight at high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers in their diet. These results suggest that polyethylene MP beads can be passed through the cricket's gut without a substantial effect on their growth, but polyethylene terephthalate microfibers cannot.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Ingestion of microplastic fibres, but not microplastic beads, impacts growth rates in the tropical house cricket Gryllodes sigillatus

Researchers exposed tropical house crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) from hatching to adulthood to diets containing polyethylene microplastic fibers or beads at multiple concentrations, finding that fiber ingestion significantly impaired growth rates while bead ingestion did not, suggesting that plastic morphology determines gut interaction severity and downstream fitness impacts in terrestrial insects.

Article Tier 2

Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus

Researchers fed microplastic fibers and beads to tropical house crickets over their development to compare the effects of different plastic shapes on growth. They found that fiber ingestion significantly reduced growth rates, while bead ingestion had no measurable impact. The study suggests that the shape of microplastic particles matters for their biological effects, with fibers potentially causing more harm to terrestrial insects than spherical particles.

Article Tier 2

The digestive system of a cricket pulverizes polyethylene microplastics down to the nanoplastic scale

This study found that crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) physically ground ingested polyethylene microplastics down to nanoplastic-scale particles through their digestive processes, a finding with implications for how insects contribute to nanoplastic generation and dispersal in terrestrial ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

The digestive system of a cricket pulverizes polyethylene microplastics

Researchers fed crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus) fluorescent polyethylene microplastics at concentrations of 0-10% (w/w) and dissected gut regions to track particle size changes along the digestive tract. Crickets egested particles substantially smaller than those ingested, with fragmentation occurring early in digestion, suggesting generalist insects can transform ingested microplastics into nanoplastic-range particles.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in the digestive tract of Gryllus pennsylvanicus crickets in a biosolid – treated agricultural field

Researchers found microplastics in the digestive tracts of over half of wild crickets collected from agricultural fields in Ontario, Canada, where sewage-based fertilizer had been applied. The crickets appeared to break down larger plastic pieces into smaller fragments, potentially spreading microplastic contamination further through the ecosystem. This shows that insects living in farm fields are ingesting microplastics and may be contributing to the movement and breakdown of plastic pollution in the food web.

Share this paper