Ingestion of Microplastic Fibres, But Not Microplastic Beads, Impacts Growth Rates in the Tropical House Cricket Gryllodes Sigillatus
Frontiers in Physiology2022
49 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 55
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Serita Fudlosid,
Serita Fudlosid,
Serita Fudlosid,
Jane E. Allison,
Serita Fudlosid,
Serita Fudlosid,
Serita Fudlosid,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Marshall W. Ritchie,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Matthew J. Muzzatti,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Matthew J. Muzzatti,
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Matthew J. Muzzatti,
Matthew J. Muzzatti,
Jane E. Allison,
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jane E. Allison,
Heath A. MacMillan,
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Jane E. Allison,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Heath A. MacMillan,
Jennifer F. Provencher
Jennifer F. Provencher
Summary
Researchers fed microplastic fibers and beads to tropical house crickets over their development to compare the effects of different plastic shapes on growth. They found that fiber ingestion significantly reduced growth rates, while bead ingestion had no measurable impact. The study suggests that the shape of microplastic particles matters for their biological effects, with fibers potentially causing more harm to terrestrial insects than spherical particles.
Microplastic is a growing concern as an environmental contaminant as it is ubiquitous in our ecosystems. Microplastics are present in terrestrial environments, yet the majority of studies have focused on the adverse effects of microplastics on aquatic biota. We hypothesized that microplastic ingestion by a terrestrial insect would have localized effects on gut health and nutrient absorption, such that prolonged dietary microplastic exposure would impact growth rate and adult body size. We further hypothesized that plastic form (fibres vs. beads) would influence these effects because of the nature of gut-plastic interactions. Freshly hatched tropical house crickets (<i>Gryllodes sigillatus</i>) were fed a standard diet containing different concentrations of either fluorescent polyethylene microplastic beads (75-105 μm), or untreated polyethylene terephthalate microfibers (< 5 mm) until they died or reached adulthood (approximately 8 weeks). Weight and body length were measured weekly and microplastic ingestion was confirmed through fluorescence microscopy and visual inspection of the frass. While, to our surprise, we found no effect of polyethylene bead ingestion on growth rate or final body size of <i>G. sigillatus</i>, females experienced a reduction in size and weight when fed high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers. These results suggest that high concentrations of polyethylene beads of the 100 μm size range can pass through the cricket gut without a substantial negative effect on their growth and development time, but high concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate microfibers cannot. Although we report the negative effects of microplastic ingestion on the growth of <i>G. sigillatus</i>, it remains uncertain what threats microplastics pose to terrestrial insects.