0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Micro(nano)plastics as an emerging risk factor to the health of amphibian: A scientometric and systematic review

Chemosphere 2021 62 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Daniela de Melo e Silva, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Daniela de Melo e Silva, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Daniela de Melo e Silva, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Thiago Lopes Rocha, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Amanda Pereira da Costa Araújo, Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia Guilherme Malafaia

Summary

Only 12 studies have examined microplastic effects on amphibians, concentrated in Brazil and China and limited mostly to the Anura order; lab-tested concentrations were far from environmentally relevant levels, leaving significant knowledge gaps about mechanisms of toxicity in this vertebrate group.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Review

Although the toxicity of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) is recognized at different trophic levels, our know-how about their effects on amphibians is limited. Thus, we present and discuss the current state on studies involving amphibians and plastic particles, based on a broad approach to studies published in the last 5 years. To search for the articles, the ISI Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were consulted, using different descriptors related to the topic of study. After the systematic search, we identified 848 publications. Of these, 12 studies addressed the relationship "plastic particles and amphibians" (7 studies developed in the laboratory and 5 field studies). The scientometric analysis points to geographic concentration of studies in Brazil and China; low investment in research in the area, and limited participation of international authors in the studies carried out. In the systematic approach, we confirm the scarcity of available data on the toxicity of plastic particles in amphibians; we observed a concentration of studies in the Anura order, only one study explored the toxicological effects of NPs and polystyrene and polyethylene are the most studied plastic types. Moreover, the laboratory tested concentrations are distant from those of the environmentally relevant; and little is known about the mechanisms of action of NPs/MPs involved in the identified (eco)toxicological effects. Thus, we strongly recommend more investments in this area, given the ubiquitous nature of NPs/MPs in aquatic environments and their possible consequences on the dynamics, reproduction, and survival of species in the natural environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper