We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene and polystyrene) and biodegradable plastics (polylactide and polybutylene succinate) on soil microbial communities. They found that both types of microplastics significantly altered soil microbial composition, but biodegradable microplastics had a more pronounced impact on soil metabolic function and microbial activity than conventional ones.
Environmental concerns with liberal petroleum-based plastic use have led to demand for sustainable biodegradable alternatives. However, the inadequate end-of-life treatment of plastics may emit microplastics, either conventional or biodegradable, to the terrestrial environment. It is essential to evaluate the possible effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the composition and function of soil microbial communities. Therefore, we conducted a soil microcosm experiment with polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), polylactide (PLA), or polybutylene succinate (PBS) microplastics. The soil microbiome and metabolome were evaluated via 16S rRNA gene sequencing, metagenomics, and untargeted metabolomics. We reported that the presence of conventional or biodegradable microplastics can significantly alter soil microbial community composition. Compared to the control soils, the microbiome in PBS and PLA amended soils exhibited higher potential for uptake of exogenous carbohydrates and amino acids, but a reduced capacity for related metabolic function, potentially due to catabolite repression. No differences in soil metabolome can be observed between conventional microplastic treatments and the control. The potential reason may be that the functional diversity was unaffected by PE and PS microplastics, while the biodegradable particles promoted the soil microbial multifunctionality. Our findings systematically shed light on the influence of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on soil microorganisms, facilitating microplastic regulation.
More Papers Like This
Discrepant soil microbial community and C cycling function responses to conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics affect soil microbial communities and carbon cycling. Researchers found that the two types of microplastics had markedly different effects, with biodegradable plastics causing more changes to microbial community structure and carbon-related gene activity. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics, while designed to be more environmentally friendly, may still significantly alter soil biology.
Effects of Conventional Non-Biodegradable Film-Derived Microplastics and New Biodegradable Film-Derived Microplastics on Soil Properties and Microorganisms after Entering Sub-Surface Soil
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional non-biodegradable plastic film-derived microplastics and biodegradable film-derived microplastics on soil biological properties, finding that both types altered soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity. Biodegradable microplastics produced distinct effects from conventional plastics, suggesting their environmental impacts should not be assumed equivalent.
The plastisphere of biodegradable and conventional microplastics from residues exhibit distinct microbial structure, network and function in plastic-mulching farmland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the bacterial communities that colonize biodegradable and conventional plastic microplastics in farmland soil. They found that biodegradable plastics (PBAT/PLA) and conventional polyethylene each attracted distinct microbial communities with different functions, including bacteria that could degrade plastics or cycle nutrients. The results suggest that even biodegradable plastics create unique microbial environments in soil that may affect soil health and function in unexpected ways.
Insights into soil microbial assemblages and nitrogen cycling function responses to conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how biodegradable polylactic acid and conventional PVC microplastics affect soil bacteria and nitrogen cycling processes. They found that both types of microplastics altered microbial communities, but biodegradable plastics had distinct effects on nitrogen-processing bacteria and did not simply behave as a harmless alternative. The study suggests that switching to biodegradable plastics may change rather than eliminate the impact of microplastic contamination on soil health.
Deciphering the effects of long-term exposure to conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the soil microbiome
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared how conventional and biodegradable microplastics affect soil microbes over long time periods and found that both types significantly changed soil microbial communities and disrupted carbon and nitrogen cycling after extended exposure. Biodegradable plastics, often marketed as eco-friendly, actually released more chemical byproducts than conventional plastics, which matters because these soil changes can affect the food we grow.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.