We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Systematic assessment of data quality and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) of current research on microplastics in biosolids and agricultural soils
AI summary Read the abstract
A systematic quality assessment of studies reporting microplastics in biosolids and agricultural soils found significant heterogeneity in concentrations attributable to differences in sampling protocols, analytical methods, and quality assurance practices, undermining cross-study comparisons.
Although a growing number of studies have reported microplastics (MPs) in biosolids and soils, there are significant differences in the concentrations found across different regions worldwide. This has raised questions about the quality of studies due to a lack of standardized sampling and analysis methods for detecting MPs in such complex samples. In this study, we applied a systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) methodology to analyze studies reporting MPs in sludge/biosolids and agricultural soils. We also assessed the quality of individual studies on MPs in sludge/biosolids and soils based on the inclusion of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures. There is limited understanding about MPs in soils with a history of biosolid application with only 9% of publications reporting MPs in biosolid-amended soil. There was almost eight orders of magnitude difference (3.4 × 10 to 9.4 × 10 particles/g) between the highest concentrations of MPs in sludge/biosolid samples compared to the lowest virgin soil samples. The literature shows a consistency in the polymer types (polyester, PP and PE) and morphotypes (fibres and fragments) of MPs most frequently detected in biosolids and soils, suggesting a potential role of biosolids in soils MP pollution. Despite the large variations in the sizes of MPs, there was a negative correlation between the lowest size detected and concentrations reported. This indicates that current concentrations of MPs are influenced by the detection size. Our assessment shows that the majority of studies to-date lack critical QA/QC measures, particularly field blank, positive control and method validation. This highlights an urgent need for quality improvement of future research in this field to produce reliable data, ultimately crucial to assess the risk of MPs and derive suitable environmental guidelines. It is recommended that MPs studies methodically include QA/QC protocols at every step of the process to ensure the integrity of the data that is published.
More Papers Like This
Quality assessment of research studies on microplastics in soils: A methodological perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
A methodological quality assessment of published soil microplastic studies identified widespread inconsistencies in extraction, identification, and reporting protocols that limit comparability and reliability of findings. The review recommends adoption of standardized quality criteria to improve the rigor and reproducibility of soil microplastic research.
Sample Collection, Preparation, and Identification of Microplastics in Soil: Issues and Recommendations
AI summary Read the abstract
An evaluation of microplastic sampling and identification protocols from 39 global soil studies found major inconsistencies in sample collection strategies, preparation methods, and detection techniques, and proposed standardized recommendations to improve data comparability.
Towards regulatory measures for microplastics in soils: further challenges and QA/QC guidelines for harmonized workflows
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers critically examined existing regulations and methodological practices for measuring plastic pollution in soils, identifying the absence of harmonized workflows as a key barrier to actionable risk assessment, and proposed a quality assurance and quality control framework to improve data comparability and support effective soil protection policy.
Errors and recommended practices that should be identified to reduce suspected concentrations of microplastics in soil and groundwater: A review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review analyzed over 185 studies on microplastics in soil and groundwater, identifying widespread methodological errors in sample quantity, quality assurance, identification, and classification, and providing recommendations to improve the reliability of future research in these environments.
Status quo of operation procedures for soil sampling to analyze microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed 106 studies on measuring microplastics in soil and found widespread inconsistency in sampling methods, sample sizes, and reporting standards, making it nearly impossible to compare results across studies. They call for a standardized protocol to ensure reproducible, comparable data that can actually inform policy to limit microplastic contamination of agricultural and natural soils.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.