0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Errors and recommended practices that should be identified to reduce suspected concentrations of microplastics in soil and groundwater: A review

Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022 38 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rogers Wainkwa Chia, Jin‐Yong Lee, Jiwook Jang, Jihye Cha

Summary

This review analyzed over 185 studies on microplastics in soil and groundwater, identifying widespread methodological errors in sample quantity, quality assurance, identification, and classification, and providing recommendations to improve the reliability of future research in these environments.

Over the last decade, many studies on microplastics (MPs) have only focused on the marine environment, and scientist have recently begun to document soil and groundwater MP contamination. However, many of these studies have included errors that should be addressed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify multiple errors in internationally reported soil and groundwater MPs studies and to provide recommendations. Over 185 original research papers on soil and groundwater MPs published between 2017 and 2022 from seven database categories in the Web of Science were sorted. These papers were manually sorted to identify errors in (i) sample quantity, (ii) quality assurance and equipment used, (iii) microplastic identification, and (iv) microplastic classification. The majority of studies were found not to use blank samples, classified MPs incorrectly by mixing MP shapes and forms, used filters with either larger pore sizes, or materials that could be potential sources of MP. In some of these studies, the statistical package or law used for statistical analysis was not specified, with some other studies using problematic MP analysis procedures. As a remediation method to address these errors, MP studies should consider using blank soil samples and metallic filters. Statistical software packages should be used, and the statistical prerequisite laws should be verified prior to analysis. Stereo microscopes should be used simultaneously with Raman or Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to identify MPs in soils and groundwater. • It is essential plastic kits are not used for storing soil and groundwater after sampling. • Accurate microplastic analysis requires at least one trip and a device blank sample each time. • Film and fragment should be classified as the same microplastics shape, not separate shapes. • A glass filter is preferable to a cellulose filter for accurate microplastics analysis. • It is critical to collect soil weight in the range of 200–1000 g for accurate microplastic analysis.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Quality assessment of research studies on microplastics in soils: A methodological perspective

A methodological quality assessment of published soil microplastic studies identified widespread inconsistencies in extraction, identification, and reporting protocols that limit comparability and reliability of findings. The review recommends adoption of standardized quality criteria to improve the rigor and reproducibility of soil microplastic research.

Article Tier 2

Sample Collection, Preparation, and Identification of Microplastics in Soil: Issues and Recommendations

An evaluation of microplastic sampling and identification protocols from 39 global soil studies found major inconsistencies in sample collection strategies, preparation methods, and detection techniques, and proposed standardized recommendations to improve data comparability.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in soils: assessment, analytics and risks

This review examines microplastic prevalence, analytical methods, and risks in soils, finding that terrestrial microplastic contamination has received far less attention than marine accumulation despite comparable or greater abundance. Researchers evaluated current difficulties in soil microplastic sampling, isolation, and identification and called for standardised methodologies to assess ecological and human health risks.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic in Soil: a Review of Detection Methods

This review examines published approaches for detecting and identifying microplastics in soil environments, synthesizing sampling, extraction, and characterization methods to address the lack of standardization that hinders cross-study comparisons. Researchers found that unifying detection methods is essential for developing a common understanding of microplastic prevalence and impact in terrestrial ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

A methodological approach of the current literature on microplastic contamination in terrestrial environments: Current knowledge and baseline considerations

This review of microplastic pollution in terrestrial and agricultural soils finds that a lack of standardized extraction and identification procedures makes most studies incomparable, calling for baseline contamination controls and harmonized reporting of concentrations, morphotypes, and analytical methods. The authors identify knowledge gaps for future research and provide minimum recommended procedures for field studies.

Share this paper