We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Status quo of operation procedures for soil sampling to analyze microplastics
Summary
Researchers reviewed 106 studies on measuring microplastics in soil and found widespread inconsistency in sampling methods, sample sizes, and reporting standards, making it nearly impossible to compare results across studies. They call for a standardized protocol to ensure reproducible, comparable data that can actually inform policy to limit microplastic contamination of agricultural and natural soils.
Abstract Since 2015, the determination of microplastics (MPs; < 5 mm) in soil has gained increasing attention. However, usual analytical protocols still render a comparison of results challenging. This structured review integrates an in-depth screening of scientific articles ( n = 106; from 1980 to 2022) that focused on determining MPs in soils. The different studies were divided into groups regarding (i) MPs input pathways, (ii) study site information, (iii) sampling design, (iv) sample preparation, and (v) analytical methods for MPs detection. Most of the studies (63%) focused on a defined study site influenced by a known point source, whereas 37% measured MPs background contents related to delocalized MPs emission sources. Even though soil was the target compartment, only 26% classified the soil type, mostly using the World Reference Base (WRB) as a classification system. Additional information on soil properties was supplied within only 20% of the studies. However, this information is mandatory for evaluation of MPs recovery tests and analytical results. In nearly all studies, the mass of the single samples equaled the final mass of the composite sample, with a mean of 1.32 kg ± 1.07 kg. However, other procedures that involve a larger sample mass seem promising but are still seldom applied. Our structured review revealed that a standard operation procedure with harmonized methods is urgently needed with a coherent and comprehensive workflow, including field sampling and sample preparation. Such a procedure would ensure the reproducibility and representativeness of analytical results, which are mandatory for evaluating and restricting MPs pollution in soils in the future. Graphical Abstract
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Sample Collection, Preparation, and Identification of Microplastics in Soil: Issues and Recommendations
An evaluation of microplastic sampling and identification protocols from 39 global soil studies found major inconsistencies in sample collection strategies, preparation methods, and detection techniques, and proposed standardized recommendations to improve data comparability.
Quality assessment of research studies on microplastics in soils: A methodological perspective
A methodological quality assessment of published soil microplastic studies identified widespread inconsistencies in extraction, identification, and reporting protocols that limit comparability and reliability of findings. The review recommends adoption of standardized quality criteria to improve the rigor and reproducibility of soil microplastic research.
Investigating microplastic dynamics in soils: Orientation for sampling strategies and sample pre‐procession
This study develops improved methods for sampling and detecting microplastics in soil, addressing a major gap in current research. Standardized sampling strategies are essential because microplastic distribution in soil is highly variable, making it easy to miss contamination with inconsistent methods. Better detection protocols will help scientists accurately measure how much microplastic is accumulating in agricultural and natural soils.
A methodological approach of the current literature on microplastic contamination in terrestrial environments: Current knowledge and baseline considerations
This review of microplastic pollution in terrestrial and agricultural soils finds that a lack of standardized extraction and identification procedures makes most studies incomparable, calling for baseline contamination controls and harmonized reporting of concentrations, morphotypes, and analytical methods. The authors identify knowledge gaps for future research and provide minimum recommended procedures for field studies.
Global soil microplastic assessment in different land-use systems is largely determined by the method of analysis: A meta-analysis
This meta-analysis pooled data from 89 studies to measure microplastic levels in soils across different land uses worldwide. A key finding is that reported microplastic concentrations vary wildly depending on the testing method used, making it hard to compare studies. This highlights that before we can truly understand how much microplastic is in the soil that grows our food, scientists need to agree on standardized measurement methods.