0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Status quo of operation procedures for soil sampling to analyze microplastics

Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2023 20 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Kristof Dorau, Martin Hoppe, Daniel Rückamp, Jan Köser, Georg Scheeder, Katrin Scholz, Elke Fries

Summary

Researchers reviewed 106 studies on measuring microplastics in soil and found widespread inconsistency in sampling methods, sample sizes, and reporting standards, making it nearly impossible to compare results across studies. They call for a standardized protocol to ensure reproducible, comparable data that can actually inform policy to limit microplastic contamination of agricultural and natural soils.

Abstract Since 2015, the determination of microplastics (MPs; < 5 mm) in soil has gained increasing attention. However, usual analytical protocols still render a comparison of results challenging. This structured review integrates an in-depth screening of scientific articles ( n = 106; from 1980 to 2022) that focused on determining MPs in soils. The different studies were divided into groups regarding (i) MPs input pathways, (ii) study site information, (iii) sampling design, (iv) sample preparation, and (v) analytical methods for MPs detection. Most of the studies (63%) focused on a defined study site influenced by a known point source, whereas 37% measured MPs background contents related to delocalized MPs emission sources. Even though soil was the target compartment, only 26% classified the soil type, mostly using the World Reference Base (WRB) as a classification system. Additional information on soil properties was supplied within only 20% of the studies. However, this information is mandatory for evaluation of MPs recovery tests and analytical results. In nearly all studies, the mass of the single samples equaled the final mass of the composite sample, with a mean of 1.32 kg ± 1.07 kg. However, other procedures that involve a larger sample mass seem promising but are still seldom applied. Our structured review revealed that a standard operation procedure with harmonized methods is urgently needed with a coherent and comprehensive workflow, including field sampling and sample preparation. Such a procedure would ensure the reproducibility and representativeness of analytical results, which are mandatory for evaluating and restricting MPs pollution in soils in the future. Graphical Abstract

Share this paper