We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What Information Do We Have on People's Willingness to Pay on Reducing Plastic Shopping Bags?
Summary
Researchers conducted a random survey of consumers in Chinese first-tier cities using an ordered logit model to analyze perceptions and willingness to pay for plastic shopping bag charges under the 2008 and 2020 Chinese bag payment policies, finding average willingness to pay approximated actual supermarket charges and identifying significant variation by gender, age, and income.
The Chinese government implemented the payment system for plastic shopping bags in 2008 and 2020. This study aims to analyze consumers' perceptions and purchase willingness of plastic shopping bags. Using information technology, a random survey was carried out in Chinese first-tier cities. After collecting the rich first-hand data, the ordered Logit model is applied to conduct the empirical investigation. The results show that the average willingness to pay is roughly equal to what supermarkets charge. For socio-demographic characteristics, male, younger, and higher-income consumers are likely to pay more money. Consumers with more positive perceptions of policy support, environmental threat, personal ability, and charging benefits tend to pay higher fees. Moreover, the marginal influence of different variables on purchase willingness is heterogeneous. This study finally puts forward targeted suggestions for reducing plastic shopping bag consumption based on findings.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Estimating Willingness to Pay for Switching to Bring Shopping Bags in Vietnam
Researchers surveyed Vietnamese consumers' willingness to pay plastic bag fees that would encourage them to bring reusable bags. Structural equation modeling showed that environmental literacy and positive attitudes toward sustainability significantly predicted willingness to pay. The findings suggest that combining education with economic incentives can shift consumer behavior toward reducing plastic bag use.
Consumer Preference for Attributes of Single-Use and Multi-Use Plastic Shopping Bags in Cape Town: A Choice Experiment Approach
Researchers used a choice experiment with 250 consumers in Cape Town to quantify willingness to pay for shopping bag attributes, finding that consumers most valued medium-sized, reusable bags -- with willingness to pay up to R7.11 per unit -- over recyclable or durable alternatives, providing evidence-based guidance for plastic bag policy interventions.
Cognitive Awareness and Consumer Willingness to Pay for Plastic Waste Management Programs: a Contingent Valuation Method
Researchers surveyed 399 households in Condong Catur, Sleman, Indonesia using stratified random sampling and contingent valuation methods to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for improved plastic waste management programmes. Results showed 78.95% of respondents were willing to pay an average of IDR 26,000 per month, with income, education, and cognitive environmental awareness as significant positive predictors, while household size and shopping location had no significant influence.
The effects of environmental information provision on plastic bag use and marine environment status in the context of the environmental levy in Greece
Researchers surveyed Greek citizens on plastic bag use and marine conservation attitudes, finding that an environmental levy on plastic bags reinforced pre-existing environmentally friendly behavior and that willingness-to-pay for marine conservation reflected both individual and collective responsibility, supporting combined economic and informational policy interventions.
Environmental Value Assessment of Plastic Pollution Control: A Study Based on Evidence from a Survey in China
Researchers assessed the environmental value of plastic pollution control in China using a choice experiment method with 450 surveyed residents, finding that residents were most willing to pay for source reduction over recycling or cleanup, and that incorporating discount rates and future price changes improves the accuracy of environmental valuation.