0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Assessment of Micro- and Nanoplastic Composition (Polymers and Additives) in the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Ebro River Fishes

Molecules 2022 16 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Maria García-Torné, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Esteban Abad, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, David Almeida, Esteban Abad, Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Esteban Abad, Esteban Abad, Esteban Abad, Esteban Abad, Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Esteban Abad, Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marta Llorca, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Esteban Abad, Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré Marinella Farré

Summary

Micro- and nanoplastics consumed by fish were analyzed for both polymer composition and chemical additives, finding that ingested particles carry a complex mixture of sorbed organic contaminants with potential bioavailability along aquatic food chains. The study highlights that polymer type alone is insufficient for assessing the health risk of microplastic ingestion.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

One of the main routes of fish exposure to micro- and nanoplastics (MNPLs) is their ingestion. MNPLs can act as reservoirs of organic contaminants that are adsorbed onto their surfaces, or that can leach from their complex formulations, with potential impacts on biota and along the aquatic food chain. While MNPLs have been reported in fishes worldwide, complete information on MNPL compositions, polymers and additives continues to be scarce. In this work, the presence of MNPLs in the gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) of fish from the Ebro River (Spain) was investigated using a double suspected screening approach to assess and quantify polymers and additives. The sample-preparation procedure consisted of sequential alkaline and acidic digestions with KOH and HNO<sub>3</sub>, followed by ultrasonic-assisted extraction (USAE) with toluene. The analysis of polymers was carried out with size-exclusion chromatography followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry using an atmospheric pressure photoionization source, operating in negative and positive ionisation modes (SEC-(±)-APPI-HRMS) using full-scan acquisition (FS). Plastic additives were assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography with a C18 analytical column coupled to HRMS equipped with an electrospray ionisation source operating under positive and negative conditions (LC-(±ESI)-HRMS). The acquisition was performed in parallel with full-scan (FS) and data-dependent scan (ddMS<sup>2</sup>) modes, working under positive and negative ionisation modes. The polymers most frequently detected and quantified in fish GITs were polysiloxanes, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS). PE was detected in 84% of the samples, with a concentration range from 0.55 to 3545 µg/g. On the other hand, plasticisers such as phthalates and stabilisers such as benzotriazoles were the most frequently identified plastic additives.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper