0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Sign in to save

Microplastic pollution in eggs impairs chick development by disrupting yolk sac function and intestinal homeostasis

Food Chemistry 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Chaoyu Zhou, Chaoyu Zhou, Chaoyu Zhou, Yao Tian, Yao Tian, Qianyu Bai, Qianyu Bai, Yinzhu Chen, Runqiu Cai, Yinzhu Chen, Runqiu Cai, Runqiu Cai, Runqiu Cai, J. Lai, Runqiu Cai, Runqiu Cai, L Ye, L Ye, Qingyi Song, Qingyi Song, Qianyu Bai, Qianyu Bai, Yanxin Hu, Yinzhu Chen, Tianlong Liu Yinzhu Chen, Tianlong Liu Qianyu Bai, Qianyu Bai, Yinzhu Chen, Yinzhu Chen, Tianlong Liu

Summary

Researchers detected microplastics in all commercial chicken eggs tested (average 17 μg/g), confirmed maternal transfer by finding polystyrene and polyethylene in all ovarian follicles, and showed that injecting polystyrene nanoplastics into yolk sacs disrupted yolk sac function and intestinal development in chicks.

Body Systems

This study quantitatively assessed microplastic contamination in commercial chicken eggs and hen ovarian follicles. Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and Laser Direct Infrared Analysis (LDIR) analyses revealed universal microplastic contamination. The dominant polymers-polypropylene, polyethylene, and polystyrene-reached concentrations of up to 227 μg/g, averaging 17.0 μg/g per egg. Crucially, maternal transfer was confirmed, with polystyrene and polyethylene detected in all ovarian follicles (6/6) at mean concentrations of 8.1 and 61.0 μg/g, respectively. To evaluate toxicity, polystyrene nanoplastics were injected into yolk sacs at 0.2, 1.0, and 5.0 mg/egg, a range where the medium dose modeled detected levels while low and high doses established dose-response relationships. Exposure caused dose-dependent growth retardation (14-day body weight: 75.4 g vs. 91.6 g in controls) and intestinal villus atrophy (556 μm vs. 787 μm). Mechanistically, transcriptomics identified disrupted autophagic flux and epithelial junctions as key toxicity pathways. This study emphasizes the potential health risks of dietary microplastic exposure.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper