We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effects of petroleum-based and biopolymer-based nanoplastics on aquatic organisms: A case study with mechanically degraded pristine polymers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the toxicity of nanoplastics made from three petroleum-based plastics and one bio-based plastic (PLA) on freshwater organisms. All four types of nanoplastics caused toxic effects, but the bio-based PLA nanoplastics were not necessarily safer than conventional ones. The study suggests that switching to bio-based plastics may not eliminate the problem of nanoplastic toxicity in aquatic environments.
Mismanaged plastic litter submitted to environmental conditions may breakdown into smaller fragments, eventually reaching nano-scale particles (nanoplastics, NPLs). In this study, pristine beads of four different types of polymers, three oil-based (polypropylene, PP; polystyrene, PS; and low-density polyethylene, LDPE) and one bio-based (polylactic acid, PLA) were mechanically broken down to obtain more environmentally realistic NPLs and its toxicity to two freshwater secondary consumers was assessed. Thus, effects on the cnidarian Hydra viridissima (mortality, morphology, regeneration ability, and feeding behavior) and the fish Danio rerio (mortality, morphological alterations, and swimming behavior) were tested at NPLs concentrations in the 0.001 to 100 mg/L range. Mortality and several morphological alterations were observed on hydras exposed to 10 and 100 mg/L PP and 100 mg/L LDPE, whilst regeneration capacity was overall accelerated. The locomotory activity of D. rerio larvae was affected by NPLs (decreased swimming time, distance or turning frequency) at environmentally realistic concentrations (as low as 0.001 mg/L). Overall, petroleum- and bio-based NPLs elicited pernicious effects on tested model organisms, especially PP, LDPE and PLA. Data allowed the estimation of NPLs effective concentrations and showed that biopolymers may also induce relevant toxic effects.
More Papers Like This
Effects of Petroleum and Bio-micro(nano)plastics on Aquatic Organisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compared the ecotoxicological effects of fossil-based and bio-based micro/nanoplastics on aquatic organisms, finding that bioplastics can degrade into micro/nanoplastics and release harmful additives and monomers. Available data suggest bioplastics may cause similar or sometimes greater harm than conventional plastics.
Secondary nanoplastics released from a biodegradable microplastic severely impact freshwater environments
AI summary Read the abstract
Secondary nanoplastics released during the degradation of a biodegradable microplastic were found to cause significant toxic effects in freshwater organisms, suggesting that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily safe. The study raises important questions about the use of biodegradable alternatives as a solution to conventional plastic pollution.
Ecotoxicity of Biodegradable Microplastics and Bio-based Microplastics: A Review of in vitro and in vivo Studies
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines whether "eco-friendly" biodegradable and bio-based plastics are truly safer than conventional plastics when they break down into microplastics. The findings show that many biodegradable plastics, including popular types like PLA and PBAT, can still cause harm to plants and aquatic organisms, suggesting that simply switching to biodegradable materials does not eliminate microplastic risks.
Nanoplastic toxicity towards freshwater organisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review covers nanoplastic toxicity toward freshwater organisms, examining both conventional and bioplastic nanoplastics, and finds that size, shape, and surface chemistry all influence toxicity across a range of invertebrate and vertebrate freshwater species.
Chronic toxicity of biodegradable microplastic (Polylactic acid) to Daphnia magna: A comparison with polyethylene terephthalate
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists compared the toxicity of biodegradable PLA microplastics with conventional PET microplastics on water fleas and found that PLA was actually more harmful. At higher concentrations, PLA microplastics killed nearly half the organisms, reduced reproduction, and increased birth defects more than PET particles did. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are safer for the environment, suggesting they may pose similar or even greater ecological risks than conventional plastics.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.