0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Evaluating the generation of microplastics from an unlikely source: The unintentional consequence of the current plastic recycling process

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 51 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Michael Stapleton, Ashley J. Ansari, Aziz Ahmed, Faisal I. Hai

Summary

This study revealed that the plastic recycling process itself generates large quantities of microplastics, particularly during the mechanical shredding step. Depending on the plastic type, shredding produced between 7,000 and 29,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of material processed, and weathered plastics generated even more. This is an important finding because it means recycling, which is intended to reduce plastic pollution, may actually be creating a significant new source of microplastic contamination.

Study Type Environmental

This study casts light on the potential of microplastic generation during plastic recycling - an unintended consequence of the process. To date, microplastics have been detected in the wastewater and sludge from plastic recycling facilities; however, generation pathways, factors and minimisation strategies are understudied. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting microplastic generation, namely, plastic type and weathering conditions. The size reduction phase, which involved the mechanical shredding of the plastic waste material, was identified to be the predominate source of microplastic generation. Material type was found to significantly affect microplastic generation rates. Focussing on the microplastic particles in the size range of 0.212-1.18 mm, polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) generated 28,600 ± 3961, 21,093 ± 2211, 18,987 ± 752 and 6807 ± 393 particles/kg of plastic material shredded, respectively. The significant variations between different plastic types were correlated (R2 = 0.88) to the hardness of the plastic. Environmental weathering was observed to significantly affect microplastic generation rates. Generation rates increased for PC, PET, PP, and HDPE by 185.05 %, 159.80 %, 123.70 % and 121.74 %, respectively, over a six-month environmental exposure period. The results in this study confirm production of large amounts of microplastics from the plastic recycling industry through its operational processes, which may be a significant source for microplastic pollution if measures to reduce their production and removal from wastewater and sludge are not considered.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Mechanical recycling of plastic waste as a point source of microplastic pollution

Researchers found that mechanical recycling of plastic waste is a significant point source of microplastic pollution, releasing plastic fragments into wastewater during washing, shredding, and processing stages of the recycling chain.

Article Tier 2

Global discharge of microplastics from mechanical recycling of plastic waste

Researchers found that the mechanical recycling process for plastics actually generates significant amounts of new microplastics, with global emissions from recycling projected to grow from 0.017 million tonnes in 2000 to 0.749 million tonnes by 2060. While recycling accounted for about 3.1% of total microplastic emissions in 2017, this share could grow as recycling increases. The study highlights an important paradox: efforts to reduce plastic waste through recycling can themselves contribute to microplastic pollution unless wastewater treatment at recycling facilities is improved.

Article Tier 2

Recycle or Not? An Exploration of Microplastic Generation During Plastic Processing via a Local Case Study

Researchers measured microplastic generation during plastic extrusion processing for both virgin and recycled materials, finding that each ton of plastic processed releases between roughly 213,000 and 98 million microplastic particles. Virgin plastic processing and water ring pelletizing techniques generated more and smaller microplastics than recycling operations, making plastic recycling the preferable option for reducing microplastic emissions. Simulations showed that up to 84% of these particles could be removed using commonly available filtration materials at processing facilities.

Article Tier 2

Plastic waste management in recycling facilities: Intentionally generated MPs as an emerging contaminant

Researchers characterized microplastic pollution in wastewater from four plastic recycling facilities in Turkey, finding that the recycling process itself generates significant quantities of microplastics. The dominant polymers detected were polyethylene and polypropylene, matching the materials being processed. The study suggests that plastic recycling facilities are an overlooked source of microplastic contamination and that better wastewater treatment at these sites is needed.

Article Tier 2

Effect of embedding a sieving phase into the current plastic recycling process to capture microplastics

Introducing a simple dry sieving step between shredding and washing stages in plastic recycling facilities can capture 96–97% of microplastics generated during shredding, compared to the roughly 76% average removal achieved by conventional water-treatment coagulation methods applied after the fact. The study shows that preventing microplastics from entering wash water in the first place is far more effective than trying to remove them from water afterward. This straightforward process modification could significantly reduce the volume of microplastics that plastic recycling plants currently discharge into waterways.

Share this paper