0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Recycle or Not? An Exploration of Microplastic Generation During Plastic Processing via a Local Case Study

Environmental Science & Technology 2024 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Wei Fan, E.T. Wei, Yuan Chen, Jinhui Li, Quanyin Tan

Summary

Researchers measured microplastic generation during plastic extrusion processing for both virgin and recycled materials, finding that each ton of plastic processed releases between roughly 213,000 and 98 million microplastic particles. Virgin plastic processing and water ring pelletizing techniques generated more and smaller microplastics than recycling operations, making plastic recycling the preferable option for reducing microplastic emissions. Simulations showed that up to 84% of these particles could be removed using commonly available filtration materials at processing facilities.

Microplastic (MP), an emerging pollutant, has been identified as a critical target in tackling plastic pollution. Although a plethora of studies have explored MP generation from various sources, limited attention has been paid to plastic processing. This study investigated MP (10 μm-5 mm) generation in virgin and waste plastic extrusion processing. MPs at a density of 2.13 × 105-9.79 × 107 (approximately 0.01-10.85 g) were generated when processing 1 t of plastic. Feedstock sources, polymer types, and pelletizing techniques were found to influence the process. With a moderate weight (270.58-527.34 t) but enormous amount (1.34 × 1016-2.63 × 1016) of MPs generated globally in 2022, plastic processing is an underestimated but vital source of MPs, emphasizing the need for MP inspection and appropriate removal technologies in the industry, especially for virgin plastic processing and water ring pelletizing. Further simulation indicated that up to 84.35% of MPs could be removed using commonly available materials in the investigated plastic processing facility, with a higher removal efficiency for larger-sized particles. In this regard, plastic recycling was superior to virgin plastic processing with fewer and larger-sized MPs generated, which could facilitate MP removal and should be fostered.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Evaluating the generation of microplastics from an unlikely source: The unintentional consequence of the current plastic recycling process

This study revealed that the plastic recycling process itself generates large quantities of microplastics, particularly during the mechanical shredding step. Depending on the plastic type, shredding produced between 7,000 and 29,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of material processed, and weathered plastics generated even more. This is an important finding because it means recycling, which is intended to reduce plastic pollution, may actually be creating a significant new source of microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Global discharge of microplastics from mechanical recycling of plastic waste

Researchers found that the mechanical recycling process for plastics actually generates significant amounts of new microplastics, with global emissions from recycling projected to grow from 0.017 million tonnes in 2000 to 0.749 million tonnes by 2060. While recycling accounted for about 3.1% of total microplastic emissions in 2017, this share could grow as recycling increases. The study highlights an important paradox: efforts to reduce plastic waste through recycling can themselves contribute to microplastic pollution unless wastewater treatment at recycling facilities is improved.

Article Tier 2

Effect of embedding a sieving phase into the current plastic recycling process to capture microplastics

Introducing a simple dry sieving step between shredding and washing stages in plastic recycling facilities can capture 96–97% of microplastics generated during shredding, compared to the roughly 76% average removal achieved by conventional water-treatment coagulation methods applied after the fact. The study shows that preventing microplastics from entering wash water in the first place is far more effective than trying to remove them from water afterward. This straightforward process modification could significantly reduce the volume of microplastics that plastic recycling plants currently discharge into waterways.

Article Tier 2

Mechanical recycling of plastic waste as a point source of microplastic pollution

Researchers found that mechanical recycling of plastic waste is a significant point source of microplastic pollution, releasing plastic fragments into wastewater during washing, shredding, and processing stages of the recycling chain.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics Identification in Plastic Recycling Facility: Removal Efficiencies of the Treatment Plants and Its Potential Release to the Environment

A plastic recycling facility in Indonesia was found to release significant quantities of microplastics into its wastewater, with nearly 500 particles per liter entering the treatment system and smaller fragments persisting even after treatment. The findings highlight that recycling operations — often considered part of the solution to plastic waste — can themselves be a meaningful source of microplastic pollution in local waterways.

Share this paper