0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Effect of embedding a sieving phase into the current plastic recycling process to capture microplastics

Journal of Water Process Engineering 2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Michael J. Staplevan, Ashley J. Ansari, Aziz Ahmed, Faisal I. Hai

Summary

Introducing a simple dry sieving step between shredding and washing stages in plastic recycling facilities can capture 96–97% of microplastics generated during shredding, compared to the roughly 76% average removal achieved by conventional water-treatment coagulation methods applied after the fact. The study shows that preventing microplastics from entering wash water in the first place is far more effective than trying to remove them from water afterward. This straightforward process modification could significantly reduce the volume of microplastics that plastic recycling plants currently discharge into waterways.

This study proposes a systematic change to the current plastic recycling process by introducing a sieving stage in between the shredding and washing units to capture the microplastics being unintentionally generated and released. The benefit of adding the sieving stage to minimise microplastics release to wash water was highlighted by comparing the findings with the case where microplastics are released to wash water and a conventional coagulation process is used to remove microplastics from water. Two coagulants, aluminium sulphate (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 .18H 2 O) and aluminium chloride (AlCl 3 .6H 2 O), were used to remove polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polycarbonate (PC) from water. The size of the microplastic particles played a significant role on the removal efficiency. The maximum removal efficiency of PET by AlCl 3 .6H 2 O was 99.2 % for the particles in 1.18–5 mm range, whereas the average removal efficiency over the whole tested size range of 0.15–5.00 mm was 76.1 % for the same plastic-coagulant combination. By contrast, the addition of a 5 mm sieve between the shredding and the washing units was found to capture 96–97 % of the microplastics generated. The findings of this innovative experiment demonstrate the beneficial impact that this strategy has on capturing microplastics prior to entering water matrix. • Microplastics in wash water reduced by >95 % when shredded plastics are dry sieved. • Capturing microplastics prior to entering the water matrix reduces complications. • Dry sieving removed microplastics more effectively than traditional coagulation. • Coagulation was more effective on larger (1.18–5 mm) PET and PC microplastics. • Deformed microplastics may trap bubbles reducing coagulation efficiency.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Mechanical recycling of plastic waste as a point source of microplastic pollution

Researchers found that mechanical recycling of plastic waste is a significant point source of microplastic pollution, releasing plastic fragments into wastewater during washing, shredding, and processing stages of the recycling chain.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics Removal from a Plastic Recycling Industrial Wastewater Using Sand Filtration

Researchers demonstrated that sand filtration can effectively remove microplastics from plastic recycling facility wastewater, with laboratory-scale tests showing significant reduction in microplastic concentrations across different polymer types, sizes, and shapes.

Article Tier 2

Effectiveness of conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants in microplastics removal: Insights from multiple analytical techniques

Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants in removing microplastics across multiple treatment stages, finding removal efficiencies of 70–90% but documenting that billions of particles still pass through in final effluent daily.

Article Tier 2

Evaluating the generation of microplastics from an unlikely source: The unintentional consequence of the current plastic recycling process

This study revealed that the plastic recycling process itself generates large quantities of microplastics, particularly during the mechanical shredding step. Depending on the plastic type, shredding produced between 7,000 and 29,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of material processed, and weathered plastics generated even more. This is an important finding because it means recycling, which is intended to reduce plastic pollution, may actually be creating a significant new source of microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics removal through water treatment plants: Its feasibility, efficiency, future prospects and enhancement by proper waste management

Researchers reviewed over 80 studies on water treatment plant performance and found microplastic removal ranges widely — from 16% in basic primary treatment up to near 100% with advanced membrane systems — but a major flaw is that removed microplastics concentrate in sludge, which can re-enter the environment. The review recommends optimizing coagulants and sludge treatment to prevent microplastics from simply being relocated rather than eliminated.

Share this paper