0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Nanoplastics in Duckweed: Single-Cell Responses and Recovery

AI summary Read the abstract

This study investigated the effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on duckweed (Lemna) at the single-cell level, finding dose-dependent disruption of photosynthesis and oxidative stress responses. Notably, duckweed showed partial recovery after nanoplastic exposure ended, indicating some resilience in aquatic macrophytes.

Micro- and nanoplastics have emerged as critical contaminants in aquatic ecosystems due to their small size, persistent nature, and potential for bioaccumulation. Nanoplastics are particularly concerning because they can be widespread in aquatic environments and ingested by aquatic organisms, posing potential risks to ecological health and environmental sustainability. However, the response and recovery of aquatic plants to nanoplastics, as well as the cell-specific molecular mechanisms underlying these processes, remain unclear. By integrating single-cell transcriptomics, enzymatic assays, and europium-doped nanoplastic tracing, we comprehensively investigated the response of duckweed to polystyrene nanoplastics at environmentally relevant and high doses over exposure and recovery phases. Nanoplastics exposure reduced plant reproduction and root length by inducing oxidative damage, with partial recovery after removal. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing revealed cell-type-specific responses of duckweed to nanoplastics, particularly in mesophyll, mestome sheath, epidermis, and parenchyma cells. Interestingly, recovery triggered a greater number of differentially expressed genes mechanistically linked to carbon metabolism, membrane transport, and stress-responsive pathways. Nanotracer quantification demonstrated root/frond absorption and 36.8-51.4% postrecovery excretion. These multiscale lines of evidence decipher the molecular strategies of duckweed to nanoplastics at single-cell resolution, providing mechanistic insights into the interactions between aquatic plants and nanoplastics contamination.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics inDuckweed: Single-Cell Responses andRecovery

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined how polystyrene nanoplastics affect duckweed at the single-cell level, documenting photosynthetic disruption and oxidative stress, as well as partial recovery after exposure ceased. The results indicate aquatic macrophytes have some resilience to nanoplastic stress but can sustain lasting cellular damage at higher doses.

Article Tier 2

The effects of microplastics on the growth and photosynthesis of Lemna minor

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed duckweed (Lemna minor) to polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) microplastics at concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 mg/L and measured effects on growth, photosynthetic yield, pigment content, and RuBisCO protein expression. PMMA-MPs were found to be more harmful than PS-MPs, causing greater reductions in chlorophyll content and stronger suppression of RuBisCO, though neither treatment significantly altered maximum quantum yield of PSII.

Article Tier 2

Do Polystyrene Nanoplastics Have Similar Effects on Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) at Environmentally Relevant and Observed-Effect Concentrations?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on duckweed (Lemna minor) at environmentally relevant concentrations versus the higher observed-effect concentrations typically used in studies. The study found that both positively and negatively charged nanoplastics produced different biological responses depending on concentration levels. The findings highlight the importance of testing at environmentally realistic concentrations to accurately assess nanoplastic risks to aquatic plants.

Article Tier 2

Biochemical and physiological insights into Lemna minor as a remediator of multi metal–microplastic contaminated waters

AI summary Read the abstract

This 42-day experiment tested how common duckweed (Lemna minor) responds to water contaminated with multiple heavy metals and polyethylene microplastics, finding that combined exposure severely stunted growth, depleted chlorophyll, and triggered major oxidative stress. Despite the damage, duckweed accumulated high concentrations of both heavy metals and microplastics in its tissue, suggesting potential for phytoremediation of contaminated water. Understanding how plants cope with — and absorb — these combined pollutants is important for both ecological risk assessment and developing water cleanup strategies.

Article Tier 2

Responses of individual and combined polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate nanoplastics on hormonal content, fluorescence/photochemistry of chlorophylls and ROS scavenging capacity in Lemna minor under arsenic-induced oxidative stress

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed duckweed plants to polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate nanoplastics under arsenic-induced stress and measured effects on hormones, photosynthesis, and antioxidant responses. They found that nanoplastics altered how plants responded to arsenic toxicity, with some combinations reducing oxidative damage while others worsened it. The study reveals that nanoplastic interactions with heavy metals in plants are complex and depend on the specific plastic type involved.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper