0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Do Polystyrene Nanoplastics Have Similar Effects on Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) at Environmentally Relevant and Observed-Effect Concentrations?

Environmental Science & Technology 2022 72 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiao Fu, Lijuan Feng, Xiaodong Sun, Yue Wang, Zhongwei Wang, Fanping Zhu, Xian-Zheng Yuan

Summary

Researchers compared the effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on duckweed (Lemna minor) at environmentally relevant concentrations versus the higher observed-effect concentrations typically used in studies. The study found that both positively and negatively charged nanoplastics produced different biological responses depending on concentration levels. The findings highlight the importance of testing at environmentally realistic concentrations to accurately assess nanoplastic risks to aquatic plants.

Polymers

Although the biological effects of nanoplastics (<100 nm in size) in aquatic environments have been increasingly investigated, almost all such studies have been performed at observed-effect concentrations (higher than 1 μg/mL). The use of observed-effect concentrations of nanoplastics can provide essential data for evaluating the potential risks, but how these results apply to the effects of concentrations of nanoplastics observed in the environment remains unclear. Here, we show that exposure to both positively and negatively charged nanoplastics at the observed-effect concentration (ranging from 0 to 50 μg/mL) can result in physiological changes of Lemna minor L., a typical flowering aquatic plant species, inducing H2O2 and O2- accumulation and even cell death. However, the nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations (lower than 0.1 μg/mL) had no obvious effects on phenotype of L. minor. Moreover, nanoplastics at both observed-effect and environmentally relevant concentrations were adsorbed onto the roots and fronds of the plants, whereas uptake by the roots and fronds occurred only at the observed-effect concentration. Although no phenotypic changes across 30 generations of cultivation were observed when the plants were exposed to 0.015 μg/mL nanoplastics, the expression of genes related to the response to stimuli and to oxidative and osmotic stress was upregulated under both observed-effect and environmentally relevant concentrations. Our findings suggest that the long-term presence of nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations might induce some variations in the transcription level and have potential threat to floating microphytes and aquatic ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Physiological responses of Lemna minor to polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate microplastics

Researchers exposed duckweed plants to two types of microplastics — polystyrene (PS) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) — and found surprisingly opposite effects: PS microplastics actually promoted plant growth, while PMMA microplastics damaged chloroplasts and stunted growth, showing that plastic type matters greatly for environmental harm.

Article Tier 2

Impact of polyethylene microbeads on the floating freshwater plant duckweed Lemna minor

Researchers exposed duckweed — a small floating freshwater plant — to polyethylene microbeads from cosmetics and found that the beads adhered to the plant surface and reduced growth at higher concentrations. The study highlights how primary microplastics from consumer products can affect freshwater plants even at relatively low doses.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics in Duckweed: Single-Cell Responses and Recovery

This study investigated the effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on duckweed (Lemna) at the single-cell level, finding dose-dependent disruption of photosynthesis and oxidative stress responses. Notably, duckweed showed partial recovery after nanoplastic exposure ended, indicating some resilience in aquatic macrophytes.

Article Tier 2

Tissue-specific responses of duckweed to cadmium stress under nanoplastic co-exposure: differential accumulation and toxicity in roots and fronds

This study found that polystyrene nanoplastics promoted cadmium accumulation in duckweed roots while paradoxically reducing cadmium toxicity in the fronds, revealing tissue-specific differences in how nanoplastic co-exposure modifies metal toxicity in aquatic plants.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics inDuckweed: Single-Cell Responses andRecovery

This study examined how polystyrene nanoplastics affect duckweed at the single-cell level, documenting photosynthetic disruption and oxidative stress, as well as partial recovery after exposure ceased. The results indicate aquatic macrophytes have some resilience to nanoplastic stress but can sustain lasting cellular damage at higher doses.

Share this paper