0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Variation in microplastic characteristics during biosolid stabilization across wastewater resource recovery facilities in the United States and Canada

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers quantified microplastic particles in 50 biosolid samples from 25 wastewater resource recovery facilities across the US and Canada, evaluating three stabilization processes: anaerobic digestion, lime stabilization, and incineration. Anaerobic digestion increased microplastic abundance by 32% and caused a 443% increase in small particles (20-150 µm), raising concerns about microplastic persistence in biosolids applied to agricultural land.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic (MP) particles have emerged as contaminants in biosolids globally, raising concerns about their potential ecological risks after land application. This study quantified MP particles in 50 biosolid samples (25 pre-stabilized, 25 post-stabilized) collected from 25 Wastewater Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRFs) across the United States and Canada. Three stabilization processes were evaluated, including Anaerobic Digestion (AD; 21 samples), Lime Stabilization (LS; 2 samples), and Incineration (INC; 2 samples). MP abundance, size distribution, shape, and polymer composition were characterized using standardized digestion, density separation, and micro-FTIR. MP particles after AD increased from 2030 to 2682 MP/g dw (+32.1 %). Small particles (20-150 μm) increased by 443 %, while those >600 μm decreased by 97 %, indicating strong fragmentation. Resistant polymers increased sharply, like PE, PS, and SR, while degradable polymers decreased, including PMMA and PEVA. LS reduced MP particles from 1388 to 964 MP/g dw (-30.5 %), yet fragmentation still occurred, with 20-150 μm particles increasing 442 % and particles >600 μm decreasing 97 %. Polymer shifts included increases in PE, ABS, and PU, and declines in PP, PVC and PEVA. INC lowered MP abundance from 2618 to 1909 MP/g dw (-27.1 %). Small particles increased by 277 %, and particles >600 μm decreased by 99 %. Heat-resistant polymers increased, including PS, PTFE, and PE, while sensitive polymers decreased, such as PMMA, PP and PEVA. Current biosolid stabilization methods are not specifically designed to address MP particles; however, the results of this study clearly show that MP particles become more fragmented and mobile through stabilization, particularly through AD and LS. This enhances the ecological and mobility risks of MP particles once introduced into the environment, particularly in agricultural soils.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Variation in microplastic concentration, characteristics and distribution in sewage sludge & biosolids around the world

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers systematically reviewed 65 studies on microplastics in sewage sludge and biosolids from wastewater treatment plants around the world. They found that while treatment processes remove 57% to 99% of microplastics from wastewater, the removed particles concentrate in sludge that is often applied to agricultural land. The review highlights that land application of biosolids may be a significant, underappreciated pathway for microplastic pollution in soils.

Article Tier 2

How many microplastic particles are present in Canadian biosolids?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers quantified microplastic particles in Canadian biosolids from wastewater treatment plants across multiple provinces, providing broader national estimates of microplastic concentrations that enter terrestrial ecosystems through agricultural land application.

Article Tier 2

Characterizing the Microplastic Content of Biosolids in Southern Ontario, Canada

AI summary Read the abstract

All 15 biosolid samples collected from 11 sewage treatment facilities across southern Ontario contained microplastics at concentrations of up to 512,000 particles per kilogram dry weight — among the highest reported globally. Since biosolids are widely applied to agricultural land as fertilizer, this represents a major pathway for microplastic pollution to enter Canadian farmland soils and, ultimately, food crops.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence of macroplastics and microplastics in biogenic waste digestate: Effects of depackaging at source and dewatering process

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated plastic debris in digestate from anaerobic digestion of biogenic waste, finding that both preprocessing and dewatering steps significantly influence the quantity of macroplastics and microplastics in the resulting material used as a soil conditioner.

Article Tier 2

Transfer and transport of microplastics from biosolids to agricultural soils and the wider environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in biosolids from two suppliers and in agricultural soils before and after biosolid application in Ontario, Canada, finding that biosolid application contributed 8,700–14,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of dry soil to agricultural fields.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper