0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Policy & Risk Sign in to save

An assessment of microplastics in fecal samples from polar bears (<i>Ursus maritimus</i>) in Canada's North

Arctic Science 2024 6 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, P.U. Iyare, P.U. Iyare, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, H.L. Vanderlip, Diane M. Orihel, Shan Zou Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, H.L. Vanderlip, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Márcia Kelly Reis Dias, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Jennifer F. Provencher, Shan Zou Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Shan Zou Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Shan Zou Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Marsha Branigan, Marsha Branigan, Shan Zou Markus Dyck, Markus Dyck, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Shan Zou Stephen C. Lougheed, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Diane M. Orihel, Peter J. Van Coeverden de Groot, Peter J. Van Coeverden de Groot, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Graham Whitelaw, Graham Whitelaw, Marsha Branigan, Diane M. Orihel, Marsha Branigan, Diane M. Orihel, Stephen C. Lougheed, Shan Zou Markus Dyck, Markus Dyck, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Diane M. Orihel, Diane M. Orihel, Diane M. Orihel, Diane M. Orihel, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Jennifer F. Provencher, Shan Zou Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Jennifer F. Provencher, Diane M. Orihel, Jennifer F. Provencher, Shan Zou

Summary

Researchers assessed the potential for plastic ingestion in polar bears from Canada by analyzing fecal samples, first validating protocols to confirm reliable microplastic recovery from bear feces. Microplastics including films, foam, and fragments were detected in polar bear feces, providing the first evidence of plastic ingestion by this Arctic apex predator.

We assessed the potential for plastic ingestion in polar bears ( Ursus maritimus (Phipps (1774))) using fecal analysis. Two method studies ensured our protocols could effectively recover and identify plastics in feces. First, microplastics (film, foam, or fragments) were intentionally introduced into a model organic matrix. Recovery rates (mean ± standard deviation) averaged 95.8 ± 14.7% ( n = 18) and were significantly affected by microplastic morphology but not digestion status. Second, microplastic fragments of polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene were intentionally introduced to polar bear feces. Recovery rates averaged 79.3 ± 21.6% ( n = 8) and Raman microscopy successfully identified all three polymers in 87.5% of samples. The main study then investigated the presence of microplastics in hunter-collected polar bear feces in the Canadian Arctic. Feces from the colons of hunted bears ( n = 15) and field scat ( n = 15) were collected through collaboration with Inuit communities. Polypropylene, polyethylene, and/or polyethylene terephthalate were detected in the feces of eight bears. Concentrations of microplastics in feces were, on average, less than 1 particle/g dry weight feces and at or near detection limits. Overall, this work suggests microplastic ingestion by Canadian polar bears may be low and demonstrates the utility of fecal sampling for community-based monitoring programs.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper