Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Nanoplastics
Sign in to save
In vitro cell-transforming potential of secondary polyethylene terephthalate and polylactic acid nanoplastics
Journal of Hazardous Materials2024
30 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 65
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Josefa Domenech,
Julia Catalán,
Julia Catalán,
Ricard Marcos,
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Alba Hernández,
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Josefa Domenech,
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Josefa Domenech,
Aliro Villacorta
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Aliro Villacorta
Alba Hernández,
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Aliro Villacorta
Juan Francisco Ferrer,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Josefa Domenech,
Alba Hernández,
Juan Francisco Ferrer,
Raquel Llorens-Chiralt,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Aliro Villacorta
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Raquel Llorens-Chiralt,
Raquel Llorens-Chiralt,
Raquel Llorens-Chiralt,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Aliro Villacorta
Alba Hernández,
Juan Francisco Ferrer,
Julia Catalán,
Julia Catalán,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Juan Francisco Ferrer,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Raquel Llorens-Chiralt,
Ricard Marcos,
Raquel Llorens-Chiralt,
Aliro Villacorta
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Aliro Villacorta
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Julia Catalán,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Julia Catalán,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Ricard Marcos,
Ricard Marcos,
Alba Hernández,
Alba Hernández,
Julia Catalán,
Aliro Villacorta
Summary
Researchers tested whether tiny nanoplastic particles from common PET plastic bottles could promote cancer development in lab cells. They found that PET nanoplastics acted as a tumor promoter, meaning they helped already-damaged cells grow into cancerous ones, even though a "biodegradable" alternative (polylactic acid) did not show the same effect. This raises concerns about long-term cancer risks from the nanoplastic particles that break off from everyday plastic bottles.
Continuous exposure to plastic pollutants may have serious consequences on human health. However, most toxicity assessments focus on non-environmentally relevant particles and rarely investigate long-term effects such as cancer induction. The present study assessed the carcinogenic potential of two secondary nanoplastics: polyethylene terephthalate (PET) particles generated from plastic bottles, and a biodegradable polylactic acid material, as respective examples of environmentally existing particles and new bioplastics. Pristine polystyrene nanoplastics were also included for comparison. A broad concentration range (6.25-200 μg/mL) of each nanoplastic was tested in both the initiation and promotion conditions of the regulatory assessment-accepted in vitro Bhas 42 cell transformation assay. Parallel cultures allowed confirmation of the efficient cellular internalisation of the three nanoplastics. Cell growth was enhanced by polystyrene in the initiation assay, and by PET in both conditions. Moreover, the number of transformed foci was significantly increased only by the highest PET concentration in the promotion assay, which also showed dose-dependency, indicating that nano PET can act as a non-genotoxic tumour promotor. Together, these findings support the carcinogenic risk assessment of nanoplastics and raise concerns regarding whether real-life co-exposure of PET nanoplastics and other environmental pollutants may result in synergistic transformation capacities.